Madry N, Auerbach B, Schelp C
Behring Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany.
Anticancer Res. 1997 Jul-Aug;17(4B):2883-6.
The incidence of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA) in different patient sera panels may be debatable, the interference of HAMA, if present, in immunochemically based assays is, however, a fact. This interference can lead to falsely elevated or depressed results depending on the nature of the HAMAs involved and the particular assay format chosen. For several reasons, assays for serum tumor markers may be especially prone to HAMA interference. Consequently, in the development of such assays, special attention should be given to the HAMA issue. In our experience, the degree of HAMA interference varies greatly from one assay to another. Nevertheless, the HAMA issue has to be addressed. Several methods have been described to remove HAMA (and other interfering substances) via sample pretreatment. Alternatively, there are also some options to counterbalance the potential effect of HAMA by using assay reagents optimized for minimal HAMA susceptibility, e.g. inclusion of an excess of non-relevant mouse antibodies. However, there is no guarantee that any given assay will not be affected by HAMA. This is especially true if a portion of the HAMA in a patient's sample is comprised of anti-idiotypic "internal image" antibodies.
不同患者血清样本中人类抗小鼠抗体(HAMA)的发生率可能存在争议,但如果存在,HAMA在基于免疫化学的检测中产生的干扰却是事实。这种干扰可能导致结果错误地升高或降低,具体取决于所涉及的HAMA的性质以及所选择的特定检测形式。由于多种原因,血清肿瘤标志物检测可能特别容易受到HAMA干扰。因此,在开发此类检测方法时,应特别关注HAMA问题。根据我们的经验,HAMA干扰程度在不同检测方法之间差异很大。然而,HAMA问题必须得到解决。已经描述了几种通过样本预处理去除HAMA(和其他干扰物质)的方法。另外,也有一些选择,例如使用针对最小HAMA敏感性优化的检测试剂(如加入过量的无关小鼠抗体)来抵消HAMA的潜在影响。然而,无法保证任何特定检测不会受到HAMA的影响。如果患者样本中的一部分HAMA由抗独特型“内影像”抗体组成,情况尤其如此。