Smith Karly B, Humphreys John S, Jones Judith A
Monash University School of Rural Health, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Oct-Dec;6(4):594. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
Quality of health services is a matter of increasing importance to health authorities. Monitoring consumer satisfaction of health care is an important input to improving the quality of health services. This article highlights a number of important considerations learned from rural consumer studies relevant to ensuring the valid measurement of consumer satisfaction with rural health services, as a means of contributing to quality improvements.
This article compares two methods of analysing rural consumers' satisfaction with healthcare services. In one study of three rural communities in western New South Wales (NSW) and eight communities in north-west Victoria, residents were asked to rate their satisfaction with five key aspects of local health services (availability, geographical accessibility, choice, continuity, economic accessibility as measured by affordability) using a 5 point Likert scale from: one = very satisfied to five = very dissatisfied. An alternative method of assessing levels of consumer satisfaction was undertaken in the survey of eight rural communities in north-west Victoria by investigating consumers' experiences with actual and potential complaints in relation to health services.
Both the NSW and Victorian respondents reported generally high levels of satisfaction with the five indicators of quality of health care. At the same time, 11% of Victorian study respondents reported having made a complaint about a health service in the previous 12 months, and one-third of the Victorian respondents reported experiences with their health services about which they wanted to complain but did not, over the same period.
Interpretation of apparent consumer satisfaction with their health services must take particular account of the measures and research methods used. In assessing consumer satisfaction with health services in rural areas, specific attention should be given to maximising the engagement of rural consumers in order to ensure representativeness of findings, and to minimise possible biases in satisfaction ratings associated with the use of particular tools.
卫生服务质量对卫生当局而言愈发重要。监测消费者对医疗保健的满意度是提高卫生服务质量的重要依据。本文重点介绍了从农村消费者研究中获得的一些重要考量因素,这些因素与确保有效衡量农村卫生服务消费者满意度相关,有助于提高服务质量。
本文比较了两种分析农村消费者对医疗服务满意度的方法。在一项针对新南威尔士州西部三个农村社区和维多利亚州西北部八个社区的研究中,居民被要求使用5分李克特量表对当地卫生服务的五个关键方面(可及性、地理可达性、选择、连续性、以可承受性衡量的经济可及性)进行满意度评分,评分范围从1 = 非常满意到5 = 非常不满意。在对维多利亚州西北部八个农村社区的调查中,采用了另一种评估消费者满意度水平的方法,即调查消费者在医疗服务方面实际和潜在的投诉经历。
新南威尔士州和维多利亚州的受访者对医疗保健质量的五项指标总体满意度较高。与此同时,11%的维多利亚州研究受访者表示在过去12个月内曾对医疗服务提出投诉,三分之一的维多利亚州受访者表示在同一时期内对医疗服务有不满但未投诉。
对消费者对其卫生服务表面上的满意度进行解读时,必须特别考虑所使用的衡量方法和研究方法。在评估农村地区消费者对卫生服务的满意度时,应特别关注最大限度地提高农村消费者的参与度,以确保研究结果具有代表性,并尽量减少与使用特定工具相关的满意度评分中可能存在的偏差。