Tabutin J, Pelegri C, Cambas P-M, Vogt F
Centre Hospitalier de Cannes, 15, avenue Broussailles, 06401 Cannes Cedex.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2006 Nov;92(7):708-14. doi: 10.1016/s0035-1040(06)75932-3.
Acetabular reconstruction is difficult after loss of bone stock and socket remodeling. Several techniques have been proposed ranging from a metal backing to allografting. We propose fence grafting. After explantation, the acetabulum is carefully cleaned of all interface tissue and precisely measured. If the vertical diameter is clearly greater than the anteroposterior diameter, a tricortical graft is harvested from the iliac crest and modeled to perfectly fit between the anterioinferior iliac spine and the residual posterior wall as well as the fundus medially. One or two oblique screws are inserted for stabilization. Any superior bone loss is filled by bone substitute (without mechanical value). The acetabulum is then reamed from the obturator foramen sparing the anterior and posterior columns. Residual bony defects are filled with cancellous bone. A hemispheric cup is then press fit and maintained with two or three screws. We performed this procedure in eight patients with SO.F.C.O.T. stage III acetabular loosening with segmentary bone loss and an oval acetabular cavity. Clinical follow-up was more than four years. The Postel-Merle-d'Aubigné score improved from 9.8 to 15.7 on average. Radiographically, there were no implant mobilization or migration and no circumferential lucent lines were observed. A nearly anatomic position was achieved in all cases except two (technical imperfection). At more than one-year follow-up, the grafts could not be distinguished from adjacent bone. For us, high-positioned or jumbo cups do not offer a satisfactory reconstruction option. There is a risk of compression with allografts from a head bank. We have not used the cemented metal-backed solution nor impacted grafts. The major drawback with fence grafting is the iliac harvesting (possible residual limping because of the extensive disinsertion of the gluteus medius. The reliable acetabular reconstruction is the major advantage. This technique is not simply an acetabular block widened laterally but it decreases the vertical dimension. This is a reliable but minute technique which allows true long-lasting reconstruction of the acetabulum.
髋臼骨量丢失和髋臼重塑后,髋臼重建具有挑战性。已经提出了多种技术,从金属衬垫到同种异体骨移植。我们提出栅栏植骨技术。取出假体后,仔细清除髋臼所有界面组织并精确测量。如果垂直直径明显大于前后直径,则从髂嵴获取一块三层皮质骨 graft,塑形后使其完美贴合在髂前下棘与残余后壁之间以及内侧的髋臼底部。插入一或两枚斜向螺钉进行固定。任何上方的骨缺损用骨替代物填充(无机械支撑作用)。然后从闭孔开始对髋臼进行扩髓,保留前后柱。残余骨缺损用松质骨填充。然后压配入一个半球形髋臼杯,并用两或三枚螺钉固定。我们对 8 例患有 SO.F.C.O.T. Ⅲ 期髋臼松动伴节段性骨丢失和椭圆形髋臼腔的患者实施了该手术。临床随访超过 4 年。Postel-Merle-d'Aubigné 评分平均从 9.8 提高到 15.7。影像学检查显示,没有植入物松动或移位,也未观察到环形透亮线。除两例(技术缺陷)外,所有病例均实现了近乎解剖学的位置。在超过一年的随访中,移植骨与相邻骨无法区分。对我们而言,高位或超大髋臼杯并不能提供令人满意的重建选择。使用骨库同种异体骨存在压缩风险。我们未采用骨水泥固定金属背衬解决方案,也未使用打压植骨。栅栏植骨的主要缺点是取自髂骨(由于臀中肌广泛止点离断,可能残留跛行)。可靠的髋臼重建是其主要优点。该技术并非简单地将髋臼块向外侧扩大,而是减小了垂直尺寸。这是一项可靠但精细的技术,可实现髋臼真正的长期重建。