Rouvelas I, Jia C, Viklund P, Lindblad M, Lagergren J
Unit of Oesophageal and Gastric Research, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden.
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2007 Mar;33(2):162-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2006.10.029. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
Oesophagectomy remains the curative treatment of choice for patients with localised oesophageal or cardia cancer, but severe postoperative complications are common. Our aim was to assess the association between surgeon volume and postoperative mortality after oesophagectomy.
Prospective, population-based study of Swedish residents diagnosed with oesophageal or cardia cancer, treated with oesophagectomy during the period April 2001 through December 2005. Details concerning patients, tumours, and surgery were collected from the Swedish Oesophageal and Cardia Cancer register. All 607 patients registered during the study period were included in the study. Risk of mortality 30 and 90 days after oesophagectomy was assessed using multivariable logistic regression, expressed in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for relevant covariates.
The 30-day mortality in low-, medium-, and high-volume surgeon groups were 7.1%, 2.1%, and 2.6%, respectively. The corresponding 90-day figures were 11.4%, 4.8%, and 8.9%. Adjusted ORs for 30- and 90-day mortality were decreased non-significantly by 58% and 14%, respectively, among patients in the high-volume group, compared to the low-volume group (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.10-1.80; OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.31-2.38). The mortality rates differed considerably between individual high-volume surgeons, but without any trend of further decreased risk with increasing volume among these surgeons (p values for trend 0.84 and 0.80 for 30- and 90-day mortality, respectively).
Patients with resectable oesophageal cancer should be advised to choose a high-volume surgeon, but they should also be aware that differences among individual surgeons might further affect survival.
食管切除术仍是局限性食管癌或贲门癌患者的首选根治性治疗方法,但术后严重并发症很常见。我们的目的是评估食管切除术后外科医生手术量与术后死亡率之间的关联。
对2001年4月至2005年12月期间接受食管切除术治疗的瑞典食管癌或贲门癌居民进行基于人群的前瞻性研究。从瑞典食管癌和贲门癌登记处收集有关患者、肿瘤和手术的详细信息。研究期间登记的所有607例患者均纳入研究。使用多变量逻辑回归评估食管切除术后30天和90天的死亡风险,以比值比(OR)表示,95%置信区间(CI),并对相关协变量进行调整。
低手术量、中等手术量和高手术量外科医生组的30天死亡率分别为7.1%、2.1%和2.6%。相应的90天数据分别为11.4%、4.8%和8.9%。与低手术量组相比,高手术量组患者30天和90天死亡率的调整后OR分别非显著降低58%和14%(OR 0.42,95%CI 0.10 - 1.80;OR 0.86,95%CI 0.31 - 2.38)。个体高手术量外科医生之间的死亡率差异很大,但这些外科医生中并没有随着手术量增加风险进一步降低 的趋势(30天和90天死亡率的趋势p值分别为0.84和0.80)。
应建议可切除食管癌患者选择高手术量的外科医生,但他们也应意识到个体外科医生之间的差异可能会进一步影响生存。