Benazzi Franco
Hecker Psychiatry Research Center at Forli, Forli, Italy.
Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;22(2):99-103. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
DSM-IV definition of hypomania of bipolar-II disorder (BP-II), which includes elevated/irritable mood change as core feature (i.e., it must always be present), is not based on sound evidence.
Following classic descriptions of hypomania, was to test if hypomania could be diagnosed on the basis of its number (9) of DSM-IV symptoms, setting no-priority symptom.
Consecutive 422 depression-remitted outpatients were re-interviewed by a mood specialist psychiatrist using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Clinician Version [a semi-structured interview modified by Benazzi and Akiskal (J Affect Disord, 2003; J Clin Psychiatry, 2005) to improve the probing for BP-II] in a private practice. History of episodes of subthreshold (i.e., 2 or more symptoms) and threshold (i.e., meeting DSM-IV criteria of elevated mood plus at least 3 symptoms, or irritable mood plus at least 4) hypomania, lasting at least 2 days, and which were the most common symptoms during the episodes, were systematically assessed.
Bipolar-II disorder (BP-II) patients (according to DSM-IV criteria, apart from hypomania duration) were 260, and major depressive disorder (MDD) patients were 162. Mood change was present in all BP-II by definition. The most common symptoms were overactivity, which was present in almost all BP-II, followed by elevated mood and racing thoughts. ROC analysis of the number of hypomanic symptoms predicting BP-II found that a cut point of 5 or more symptoms over 9 had the best combination of sensitivity (90%) and specificity (84%), and the highest figure of correctly classified (87%) BP-II. History of episodes of 5 or more hypomanic symptoms was met by almost all BP-II.
Single interviewer.
Following classic descriptions of hypomania, not setting any priority among the three basic domains of hypomania (mood, thinking, behavior), results suggest that a cutoff number of 5 symptoms over 9 (of those listed by DSM-IV) could be used to diagnose hypomania of BP-II. Diagnosing hypomania by counting a checklist of symptoms should make it easier to diagnose BP-II, and should reduce the current high misdiagnosis of BP-II as MDD, significantly impacting the treatment of depression.
双相II型障碍(BP-II)轻躁狂的DSM-IV定义,将情绪高涨/易激惹的情绪变化作为核心特征(即必须始终存在),其依据并不充分。
遵循轻躁狂的经典描述,测试是否可根据DSM-IV的9项症状来诊断轻躁狂,且不设优先症状。
在私人诊所中,由一位情绪专科精神科医生使用《DSM-IV轴I障碍临床定式检查-临床版》[经贝纳齐和阿基斯卡尔(《情感障碍杂志》,2003年;《临床精神病学杂志》,2005年)修改的半定式访谈,以改进对BP-II的探查],对422名已缓解抑郁的门诊患者进行再次访谈。系统评估阈下(即2项或更多症状)和阈上(即符合DSM-IV情绪高涨标准加至少3项症状,或易激惹情绪加至少4项症状)轻躁狂发作的病史,发作持续至少2天,以及发作期间最常见的症状。
双相II型障碍(BP-II)患者(根据DSM-IV标准,除轻躁狂持续时间外)有260例,重度抑郁症(MDD)患者有162例。根据定义,所有BP-II患者均存在情绪变化。最常见的症状是活动增多,几乎所有BP-II患者都有,其次是情绪高涨和思维奔逸。对预测BP-II的轻躁狂症状数量进行ROC分析发现,9项症状中5项或更多症状的切点具有最佳的敏感性(90%)和特异性(84%)组合,以及最高的BP-II正确分类率(87%)。几乎所有BP-II患者都有5项或更多轻躁狂症状发作的病史。
由单一访谈者进行访谈。
遵循轻躁狂的经典描述,在轻躁狂的三个基本领域(情绪、思维、行为)中不设任何优先顺序,结果表明,9项症状(DSM-IV列出的症状)中5项症状的切点可用于诊断BP-II的轻躁狂。通过计算症状清单来诊断轻躁狂应会使BP-II的诊断更容易,并应减少目前将BP-II误诊为MDD的高误诊率,对抑郁症的治疗产生重大影响。