Sinning Jan-Malte, Bickel Christoph, Messow Claudia-Martina, Schnabel Renate, Lubos Edith, Rupprecht Hans J, Espinola-Klein Christine, Lackner Karl J, Tiret Laurence, Münzel Thomas, Blankenberg Stefan
Department of Medicine, Bundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz, Germany.
Eur Heart J. 2006 Dec;27(24):2962-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl362. Epub 2006 Nov 28.
C-reactive protein and fibrinogen have been extensively studied and shown to be predictive for a first cardiovascular event in healthy individuals. We evaluated the potential clinical use of C-reactive protein and fibrinogen in patients already suffering from coronary artery disease (CAD).
In a substudy of the prospective AtheroGene registry, we assessed in 1806 patients with documented CAD and stable angina pectoris, the risk of cardiovascular death and non-fatal myocardial infarction (n=183) over a median follow-up of 3.5 (maximum 7.7) years according to baseline levels of C-reactive protein and fibrinogen. C-reactive protein and fibrinogen were associated with future cardiovascular events, such as an increment in one standard deviation of C-reactive protein is associated with a 1.15-fold (95% CI 1.05-1.27, P=0.002) increase, an increment of one standard deviation of fibrinogen with a 1.27-fold (95% CI 1.12-1.43, P<0.0005) increase in hazard risk in the models adjusted for age and sex. Adjustment for traditional risk factors and clinical confounders did not significantly attenuate this relationship. In a comparison of a basic model (traditional risk factors; AUC=0.68) with models additionally including either C-reactive protein (AUC=0.69) or fibrinogen (AUC=0.70), only little additional predictive information over that obtained from assessment of traditional risk factors was obtained.
In patients with documented CAD, C-reactive protein and fibrinogen were predictive for future cardiovascular risk, but did not provide further information on top of that obtained from models including traditional risk factors. Our data emphasize the clinical importance of traditional risk factors in patients with CAD.
C反应蛋白和纤维蛋白原已得到广泛研究,并显示可预测健康个体首次发生心血管事件。我们评估了C反应蛋白和纤维蛋白原在已患有冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中的潜在临床应用价值。
在一项前瞻性动脉粥样硬化基因登记研究的子研究中,我们对1806例有CAD记录且患有稳定型心绞痛的患者进行了评估,根据C反应蛋白和纤维蛋白原的基线水平,在中位随访3.5年(最长7.7年)期间发生心血管死亡和非致命性心肌梗死(n = 183)的风险。C反应蛋白和纤维蛋白原与未来心血管事件相关,例如在年龄和性别校正模型中,C反应蛋白增加一个标准差与风险增加1.15倍(95% CI 1.05 - 1.27,P = 0.002)相关,纤维蛋白原增加一个标准差与风险增加1.27倍(95% CI 1.12 - 1.43,P < 0.0005)相关。对传统风险因素和临床混杂因素进行校正并未显著减弱这种关系。在将基本模型(传统风险因素;AUC = 0.68)与额外纳入C反应蛋白(AUC = 0.69)或纤维蛋白原(AUC = 0.70)的模型进行比较时,相较于从传统风险因素评估中获得的信息,仅获得了很少的额外预测信息。
在有CAD记录的患者中,C反应蛋白和纤维蛋白原可预测未来心血管风险,但在包含传统风险因素的模型基础上并未提供更多信息。我们的数据强调了传统风险因素在CAD患者中的临床重要性。