Younger Jarred W, Rossetti Gina C, Borckardt Jeffrey J, Smith Arthur R, Tasso Anthony F, Nash Michael R
Stanford University School of Medicine, Department of Anesthesea, Stanford, California 94304-1573, USA.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn. 2007 Jan;55(1):1-13. doi: 10.1080/00207140600995745.
The relationship between hypnotizability and somatic illness was measured in 45 college students. Several weeks after completing the Waterloo-Stanford Group C Scale (WSGC), participants filled out a somatic-complaint checklist and measures of psychopathology. Results indicated a positive correlation between hypnotizability and somatic illness, and the relationship was stronger for female participants. In contrast to the quadratic model proposed by Wickramasekera, the current data demonstrated a linear relationship between hypnotizability and somatic complaint. Further analyses showed that somatic complaints were associated with hallucination and imagery items, corresponding to the perceptual-cognitive factor identified in Woody, Barnier, and McConkey's (2005) factor analysis of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. The results call into question some claims that high hypnotizability is an adaptive and healthy trait.
对45名大学生的催眠易感性与躯体疾病之间的关系进行了测量。在完成滑铁卢-斯坦福C组量表(WSGC)几周后,参与者填写了一份躯体不适检查表和心理病理学测量表。结果表明,催眠易感性与躯体疾病之间存在正相关,且这种关系在女性参与者中更强。与Wickramasekera提出的二次模型不同,当前数据表明催眠易感性与躯体不适之间存在线性关系。进一步分析表明,躯体不适与幻觉和意象项目相关,这与Woody、Barnier和McConkey(2005年)对斯坦福催眠易感性量表C型的因素分析中确定的感知-认知因素相对应。这些结果对一些认为高催眠易感性是一种适应性和健康特质的说法提出了质疑。