Suppr超能文献

被试间与被试内模仿设计的比较。

A comparison of between- and within-subjects imitation designs.

作者信息

Kressley Regina A, Knopf Monika

机构信息

Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Department of Developmental Psychology, Georg-Voigt-Str. 8, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

出版信息

Infant Behav Dev. 2006 Dec;29(4):564-73. doi: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.07.012. Epub 2006 Nov 13.

Abstract

Two experimental methods, which have dominated the study of declarative memory in preverbal children with imitation tasks, namely the deferred imitation and elicited imitation paradigm, differ in the amount of physical contact with test stimuli afforded infants prior to a test for long-term recall. The current study assessed effects of pre- and post-demonstration contact with test stimuli on deferred imitation of novel, single-step unrelated actions with multiple objects by 8(1/2)- and 10(1/2)-month-old infants (N=50). The rate of target action completion after a delay remained consistent at both ages across different conditions of prior contact with test stimuli. This study shows that a within-subjects baseline appraisal is valid within certain experimental parameters and offers a more economical alternative. The results show furthermore that different experimental designs utilized to assess deferred imitation are highly comparable for the first year despite differences in determining baseline.

摘要

两种实验方法主导了对不会说话儿童的陈述性记忆的研究,这两种方法采用模仿任务,即延迟模仿和诱发模仿范式,它们在对婴儿进行长期记忆测试之前,与测试刺激的身体接触量有所不同。本研究评估了在示范前后与测试刺激接触,对8(1/2)个月和10(1/2)个月大婴儿(N = 50)对多个物体的新颖、单步不相关动作的延迟模仿的影响。在延迟后,目标动作完成率在两个年龄组中,在与测试刺激的不同先前接触条件下保持一致。本研究表明,在某些实验参数范围内,受试者内基线评估是有效的,并且提供了一种更经济的选择。结果还表明,尽管在确定基线方面存在差异,但用于评估延迟模仿的不同实验设计在第一年中具有高度可比性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验