Crofts Joanna F, Bartlett Christine, Ellis Denise, Hunt Linda P, Fox Robert, Draycott Timothy J
Simulation and Fire-drill Evaluation (SaFE) Study, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, North Bristol National Health Service Trust, Southmead Hospital, and University Department of Clinical Sciences at South Bristol, University of Bristol, UK.
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Dec;108(6):1477-85. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000246801.45977.c8.
To evaluate the effectiveness of simulation training for shoulder dystocia management and compare training using a high-fidelity mannequin with that using traditional devices.
Training was undertaken in six hospitals and a medical simulation center in the United Kingdom. Midwives and obstetricians working for participating hospitals were eligible for inclusion. One hundred forty participants (45 doctors, 95 midwives) were randomized to training with a high-fidelity training mannequin (incorporating force perception training) or traditional low-fidelity mannequins. Performance was assessed pre- and posttraining, using a videoed, standardized shoulder dystocia simulation. Outcome measures were delivery, head-to-body delivery time, use of appropriate and inappropriate actions, force applied, and communication.
One hundred thirty-two participants completed the posttraining assessment. All training was associated with improved performance: use of basic maneuvers 114 of 140 (81.4%) to 125 of 132 (94.7%) (P=.002), successful deliveries 60 of 140 (42.9%) to 110 of 132 (83.3%) (P<.001), good communication with the patient 79 of 139 (56.8%) to 109 of 132 (82.6%) (P<.001), pre- and posttraining, respectively. Training with the high-fidelity mannequin was associated with a higher successful delivery rate than training with traditional devices: 94% compared with 72% (odds ratio 6.53, 95% confidence interval 2.05-20.81; P=.002). Total applied force was significantly lower for those who had undergone force training (2,030 Newton seconds versus 2,916 Newton seconds; P=.006) but there was no significant difference in the peak applied force 102 Newtons versus 112 Newtons (P=.242).
This study verifies the need for shoulder dystocia training; before training only 43% participants could achieve delivery. All training with mannequins improved the management of simulated shoulder dystocia. Training on a high-fidelity mannequin, including force perception teaching, offered additional training benefits.
I.
评估肩难产处理模拟训练的有效性,并比较使用高仿真模型训练与使用传统设备训练的效果。
在英国的六家医院和一个医学模拟中心开展培训。参与医院的助产士和产科医生符合纳入条件。140名参与者(45名医生,95名助产士)被随机分为使用高仿真训练模型(包含力感知训练)或传统低仿真模型进行训练。在训练前后,通过视频记录的标准化肩难产模拟来评估表现。结果指标包括分娩情况、头体娩出时间、恰当与不恰当操作的使用、施加的力量以及沟通情况。
132名参与者完成了训练后评估。所有训练均与表现改善相关:基本操作的使用从140人中的114人(81.4%)提升至132人中的125人(94.7%)(P = 0.002),成功分娩从140人中的60人(42.9%)提升至132人中的110人(83.3%)(P < 0.001),与患者的良好沟通从139人中的79人(56.8%)提升至132人中的109人(82.6%)(P < 0.001),分别为训练前后的情况。使用高仿真模型训练的成功分娩率高于使用传统设备训练:94% 对比72%(优势比6.53,95%置信区间2.05 - 20.81;P = 0.002)。接受力训练者的总施加力量显著更低(2030牛顿秒对比2916牛顿秒;P = 0.006),但峰值施加力量无显著差异(102牛顿对比112牛顿;P = 0.242)。
本研究证实了肩难产训练的必要性;训练前只有43%的参与者能够完成分娩。所有使用模型的训练均改善了模拟肩难产的处理。在高仿真模型上的训练,包括力感知教学,带来了额外的训练益处。
I级