Suppr超能文献

EQ-5D在评估和衡量精神分裂症、分裂型障碍或妄想性障碍患者健康状况方面的有效性。

Validity of the EQ-5D in assessing and valuing health status in patients with schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorders.

作者信息

König Hans-Helmut, Roick Christiane, Angermeyer Matthias C

机构信息

Health Economics Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, 04317 Leipzig, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;22(3):177-87. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Dec 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The EQ-5D is a generic questionnaire generating a health profile and a single index score for health-related quality of life. This study aimed to analyse the discriminative ability and validity of the EQ-5D in patients with schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorders.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

One hundred sixty-six patients with schizophrenic, schizotypal or delusional disorders (ICD-10 F2) completed the EQ-5D. Measures of quality of life (WHOQOL-BREF), utility (TTO), subjective (SCL-90R) and objective (PANSS, CGI-S) psychopathology, and functioning (GAF, GARF, SOFAS, HoNOS) provided comparison. Discriminative ability was analysed by assessing frequency distributions of EQ-5D scores. Validity of the EQ-5D self-classifier was analysed by assessing differences in related other scores grouped by response levels of EQ-5D items. Validity of the visual analogue scale (EQ VAS) and the EQ-5D index (UK social tariff) was analysed by assessing their correlation with all other scores.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine percent of respondents reported problems in at least one of the EQ-5D dimensions (anxiety/depression 57%, usual activities 45%, pain/discomfort 44%, self-care 29%, mobility 22%). The mean EQ VAS score/EQ-5D index was 65.7/0.71. The four most frequently reported EQ-5D health states covered 45% of all respondents. For almost all EQ-5D dimensions, different response levels were associated with significantly different scores of measures used for comparison. Correlation of EQ VAS score and EQ-5D index were largest with scores of subjective measures (SCL-90R: -0.50 and -0.73; WHOQOL mental subscore 0.62 and 0.58; always P<0.001).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The EQ-5D showed a moderate ceiling effect and seems to be reasonably valid in this patient group.

摘要

目的

EQ-5D是一份通用问卷,用于生成健康概况和与健康相关的生活质量单项指标得分。本研究旨在分析EQ-5D在精神分裂症、分裂型障碍或妄想障碍患者中的区分能力和效度。

对象与方法

166例精神分裂症、分裂型障碍或妄想障碍(ICD-10 F2)患者完成了EQ-5D问卷。采用生活质量量表(WHOQOL-BREF)、效用值(TTO)、主观精神病理学量表(SCL-90R)和客观精神病理学量表(PANSS、CGI-S)以及功能量表(GAF、GARF、SOFAS、HoNOS)进行比较。通过评估EQ-5D得分的频率分布来分析区分能力。通过评估按EQ-5D项目回答水平分组的相关其他得分差异,分析EQ-5D自我分类器的效度。通过评估视觉模拟量表(EQ VAS)和EQ-5D指数(英国社会关税)与所有其他得分的相关性,分析其效度。

结果

79%的受访者报告在EQ-5D的至少一个维度存在问题(焦虑/抑郁57%,日常活动45%,疼痛/不适44%,自我护理29%,行动能力22%)。EQ VAS得分/EQ-5D指数的平均值为65.7/0.71。最常报告的四种EQ-5D健康状态涵盖了45%的受访者。对于几乎所有EQ-5D维度,不同的回答水平与用于比较的量表得分存在显著差异。EQ VAS得分和EQ-5D指数与主观量表得分的相关性最高(SCL-90R:-0.50和-0.73;WHOQOL精神领域得分0.62和0.58;均P<0.001)。

讨论与结论

EQ-5D显示出中等程度的天花板效应,在该患者群体中似乎具有合理的效度。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验