Suppr超能文献

在使用被动固定装置进行血管腔内腹主动脉瘤修复术后,主动脉颈部扩张和延长在支架移植物迁移病因中的作用。

The role of aortic neck dilation and elongation in the etiology of stent graft migration after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a passive fixation device.

作者信息

Litwinski Roman A, Donayre Carlos E, Chow Sheryl L, Song Tae K, Kopchok George, Walot Irwin, White Rodney A

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA 90509, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2006 Dec;44(6):1176-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.028.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is complicated by the potential for stent graft migration over time. Factors including the type of fixation, initial proximal fixation length, and dilation and elongation of the infrarenal aortic neck may contribute to device migration. We sought to determine when device migration is a real phenomenon with actual device movement that compromises aneurysm exclusion.

METHODS

Computed tomographic (CT) scans and computer reconstructions of all patients undergoing endovascular AAA repair with a passive fixation device at our institution from June 1996 to October 2004 were retrospectively reviewed. The distance from the distal renal artery to the proximal end of the stent graft at the time of initial deployment was determined for each patient. Migration was defined as a distance increase greater than 5 mm in the follow-up period; proximal fixation length, aortic neck enlargement and elongation, and neck angle were then measured. Data were further analyzed with respect to AAA growth, development of endoleak, AAA rupture, and the need for reintervention.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients with endovascular AAA repairs using a passive fixation device had complete postoperative imaging data sets; 48 patients (15.6%) with stent graft migration of 5 mm or more were identified, and 25 (8.1%) of these had a migration of 10 mm or more. Seventeen (35.4%) of 48 migration patients had a total loss of the proximal seal zone (loss patients); their average migration distance was 17.7 +/- 12.0 mm, with a mean neck shortening of 13.6 +/- 14.2 mm, and the average proximal fixation length loss was 14.0 +/- 7.6 mm. Those 31 patients with an intact proximal seal zone (nonloss patients) showed an average migration of 9.4 +/- 3.7 mm, with a mean neck lengthening of 9.6 +/- 8.4 mm and an average proximal fixation length change of 0.7 +/- 8.0 mm. Univariate analysis demonstrated significant differences between the loss and nonloss patients in follow-up duration (65.9 +/- 20.4 months vs 45.9 +/- 26.4 months; P = .01), neck dilatation at the distal renal artery (4.6 +/- 4.5 mm vs 1.8 +/- 1.9 mm; P = .026), stent graft migration distance (17.7 +/- 12.0 mm vs 9.4 +/- 3.7 mm; P = .001), change in aortic neck length (-13.6 +/- 14.2 mm vs 9.6 +/- 8.4 mm; P < .0001), change in proximal fixation length (-14.0 +/- 7.6 mm vs 0.7 +/- 8.0 mm; P < .0001), change in AAA size (1.8 +/- 7.1 mm vs -3.6 +/- 9.7 mm; P = .033), and use of a stiff body stent graft (47.1% vs 19.4%; P = .043). However, only change in aortic neck length was statistically significant on multivariate analysis (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.591-0.961; P = .022). There were no differences between the loss and nonloss patients in time to migration discovery, initial AAA size, initial aortic neck diameter or length, initial device oversizing, initial neck angle, neck angle increase, type II endoleak, or AAA rupture. Eight of the 17 loss patients have been treated with proximal aortic cuffs; the remainder have refused reintervention, died of unrelated causes, or elected to have open repair.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative elongation of the infrarenal aortic neck may create the radiographic perception of migration without necessarily causing a loss of proximal stent graft fixation. Patients with a total loss of the proximal seal zone actually have infrarenal aortic neck shortening, with a degree of neck dilatation beyond initial device oversizing that may compromise proximal fixation length. Conversely, those with an intact proximal seal zone demonstrate aortic neck elongation equivalent to migration, with no loss of proximal fixation length; these patients have a benign natural history without intervention. Thus, aortic neck dilatation beyond oversizing, aortic neck shortening, and loss of proximal fixation length are more clinically relevant predictors of proximal stent graft failure than simple migration distance.

摘要

目的

腹主动脉瘤(AAA)的血管内修复术存在支架移植物随时间迁移的潜在风险。包括固定类型、初始近端固定长度以及肾下腹主动脉颈部扩张和伸长等因素可能导致装置迁移。我们试图确定何时装置迁移是一种伴有实际装置移动且会影响动脉瘤隔绝效果的真实现象。

方法

回顾性分析了1996年6月至2004年10月在我院接受使用被动固定装置进行腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术的所有患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)图像和计算机重建图像。确定每位患者初次植入时从肾动脉远端到支架移植物近端的距离。迁移定义为随访期间距离增加超过5mm;然后测量近端固定长度、主动脉颈部扩大和伸长情况以及颈部角度。进一步分析有关腹主动脉瘤生长、内漏发生、腹主动脉瘤破裂以及再次干预需求的数据。

结果

共有308例使用被动固定装置进行腹主动脉瘤血管内修复术的患者有完整的术后影像数据集;识别出48例(15.6%)支架移植物迁移5mm或更多的患者,其中25例(8.1%)迁移10mm或更多。48例迁移患者中有17例(35.4%)近端密封区完全丧失(丧失患者);他们的平均迁移距离为17.7±12.0mm,平均颈部缩短13.6±14.2mm,近端固定长度平均丧失14.0±7.6mm。其余31例近端密封区完整的患者(非丧失患者)平均迁移9.4±3.7mm,平均颈部伸长9.6±8.4mm,近端固定长度平均变化0.7±8.0mm。单因素分析显示,丧失患者与非丧失患者在随访时间(65.9±20.4个月对45.9±26.4个月;P = 0.01)、肾动脉远端颈部扩张(4.6±4.5mm对1.8±1.9mm;P = 0.026)、支架移植物迁移距离(17.7±12.0mm对9.4±3.7mm;P = 0.001)、主动脉颈部长度变化(-13.6±14.2mm对9.6±8.4mm;P < 0.0001)、近端固定长度变化(-14.0±7.6mm对0.7±8.0mm;P < 0.0001)、腹主动脉瘤大小变化(1.8±7.1mm对-3.6±9.7mm;P = 0.033)以及使用硬体支架移植物方面(47.1%对19.4%;P = 0.043)存在显著差异。然而,多因素分析显示只有主动脉颈部长度变化具有统计学意义(比值比,0.75;95%置信区间,0.591 - 0.961;P = 0.022)。丧失患者与非丧失患者在迁移发现时间、初始腹主动脉瘤大小、初始主动脉颈部直径或长度、初始装置过大尺寸、初始颈部角度、颈部角度增加、II型内漏或腹主动脉瘤破裂方面无差异。17例丧失患者中有8例接受了近端主动脉袖带治疗;其余患者拒绝再次干预、死于无关原因或选择接受开放修复。

结论

肾下腹主动脉颈部术后伸长可能造成影像学上的迁移假象,而不一定导致近端支架移植物固定丧失。近端密封区完全丧失的患者实际上存在肾下腹主动脉颈部缩短,颈部扩张程度超过初始装置过大尺寸,这可能损害近端固定长度。相反,近端密封区完整的患者表现出与迁移相当的主动脉颈部伸长,近端固定长度无丧失;这些患者无需干预,其自然病程良好。因此,与单纯的迁移距离相比,超过过大尺寸的主动脉颈部扩张、主动脉颈部缩短以及近端固定长度丧失是近端支架移植物失败更具临床意义的预测指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验