Young Allan
McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Sci Context. 2006 Mar;19(1):175-89. doi: 10.1017/s0269889705000815.
Throughout his career as a writer, Sigmund Freud maintained an interest in the evolutionary origins of the human mind and its neurotic and psychotic disorders. In common with many writers then and now, he believed that the evolutionary past is conserved in the mind and the brain. Today the "evolutionary Freud" is nearly forgotten. Even among Freudians, he is regarded to be a red herring, relevant only to the extent that he diverts attention from the enduring achievements of the authentic Freud. There are three ways to explain these attitudes. First, the evolutionary Freud's key work is the "Overview of the Transference Neurosis" (1915). But it was published at an inopportune moment, forty years after the author's death, during the so-called "Freud wars." Second, Freud eventually lost interest in the "Overview" and the prospect of a comprehensive evolutionary theory of psychopathology. The publication of The Ego and the Id (1923), introducing Freud's structural theory of the psyche, marked the point of no return. Finally, Freud's evolutionary theory is simply not credible. It is based on just-so stories and a thoroughly discredited evolutionary mechanism, Lamarckian use-inheritance. Explanations one and two are probably correct but also uninteresting. Explanation number three assumes that there is a fundamental difference between Freud's evolutionary narratives (not credible) and the evolutionary accounts of psychopathology that currently circulate in psychiatry and mainstream journals (credible). The assumption is mistaken but worth investigating.
在其写作生涯中,西格蒙德·弗洛伊德一直对人类思维及其神经症和精神疾病的进化起源感兴趣。与当时和现在的许多作家一样,他认为进化的过去保存在思维和大脑中。如今,“进化的弗洛伊德”几乎被遗忘了。即使在弗洛伊德主义者中,他也被视为一个转移注意力的因素,其相关性仅在于他将注意力从真正的弗洛伊德的持久成就上转移开。对这些态度有三种解释。首先,进化的弗洛伊德的关键著作是《移情神经症概论》(1915年)。但它在一个不合适的时机出版,即在作者去世四十年后,处于所谓的“弗洛伊德论战”期间。其次,弗洛伊德最终对《概论》以及精神病理学全面进化理论的前景失去了兴趣。《自我与本我》(1923年)的出版引入了弗洛伊德的心理结构理论,标志着无法回头的转折点。最后,弗洛伊德的进化理论根本不可信。它基于一些想当然的故事和一种彻底声名狼藉的进化机制,即拉马克的用进废退遗传。解释一和解释二可能是正确的,但也无趣。解释三假定弗洛伊德的进化叙事(不可信)与目前在精神病学和主流期刊中流传的精神病理学进化解释(可信)之间存在根本差异。这个假定是错误的,但值得研究。