Suppr超能文献

氟康唑用于发热性中性粒细胞减少症癌症患者的经验性抗真菌治疗。

Fluconazole for empiric antifungal therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia.

作者信息

Yu Donghui T, Seger Diane L, Peterson Josh F, Kumar Ritesh N, Bates David W

机构信息

Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Dec 5;6:173. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-173.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of fluconazole as empiric antifungal therapy in cancer patients with fever and neutropenia. Our objective was to assess the frequency and resource utilization associated with treatment failure in cancer patients given empiric fluconazole antifungal therapy in routine inpatient care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of cancer patients treated with oral or intravenous fluconazole between 7/97 and 6/01 in a tertiary care hospital. The final study cohort included cancer patients with neutropenia (an absolute neutrophil count below 500 cells/mm3) and fever (a temperature above 38 degrees C or 100.4 degrees F), who were receiving at least 96 hours of parenteral antibacterial therapy prior to initiating fluconazole. Patients' responses to empiric therapy were assessed by reviewing patient charts.

RESULTS

Among 103 cancer admissions with fever and neutropenia, treatment failure after initiating empiric fluconazole antifungal therapy occurred in 41% (95% confidence interval (CI) 31%-50%) of admissions. Patients with a diagnosis of hematological malignancy had increased risk of treatment failure (OR = 4.6, 95% CI 1.5-14.8). When treatment failure occurred the mean adjusted increases in length of stay and total costs were 7.4 days (95% CI 3.3-11.5) and $18,925 (95% CI 3,289-34,563), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Treatment failure occurred in more than one-third of neutropenic cancer patients on fluconazole as empiric antifungal treatment for fever in routine clinical treatment. The increase in costs when treatment failure occurs is substantial.

摘要

背景

多项临床试验已证明氟康唑作为经验性抗真菌治疗药物,对伴有发热和中性粒细胞减少的癌症患者有效。我们的目的是评估在常规住院治疗中接受经验性氟康唑抗真菌治疗的癌症患者出现治疗失败的频率及资源利用情况。

方法

我们对一家三级护理医院在1997年7月至2001年6月期间接受口服或静脉注射氟康唑治疗的癌症患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。最终的研究队列包括中性粒细胞减少(绝对中性粒细胞计数低于500个细胞/mm³)且发热(体温高于38℃或100.4℉)的癌症患者,这些患者在开始使用氟康唑之前至少接受了96小时的胃肠外抗菌治疗。通过查阅患者病历评估患者对经验性治疗的反应。

结果

在103例伴有发热和中性粒细胞减少的癌症住院患者中,开始经验性氟康唑抗真菌治疗后,41%(95%置信区间[CI] 31%-50%)的患者出现治疗失败。诊断为血液系统恶性肿瘤的患者治疗失败风险增加(OR = 4.6,95% CI 1.5-14.8)。当出现治疗失败时,平均调整后的住院时间延长7.4天(95% CI 3.3-至11.5),总成本增加18,925美元(95% CI 3,289-34,563)。

结论

在常规临床治疗中,超过三分之一的中性粒细胞减少癌症患者接受氟康唑作为发热的经验性抗真菌治疗时出现治疗失败。治疗失败时成本增加幅度很大。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
Empirical antifungal therapy.经验性抗真菌治疗。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004 Feb;23(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.11.002.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验