• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

鸟类捕食导致的频率依赖性味觉排斥可能会促使具有警戒色的猎物在防御性化学物质方面产生多态性。

Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey.

作者信息

Skelhorn John, Rowe Candy

机构信息

School of Biology, University of Newcastle, Henry Wellcome Building for Neuroecology, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.

出版信息

Biol Lett. 2005 Dec 22;1(4):500-3. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0359.

DOI:10.1098/rsbl.2005.0359
PMID:17148243
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1626375/
Abstract

Chemically defended insects advertise their unpalatability to avian predators using conspicuous aposematic coloration that predators learn to avoid. Insects utilize a wide variety of different compounds in their defences, and intraspecific variation in defence chemistry is common. We propose that polymorphisms in insect defence chemicals may be beneficial to insects by increasing survival from avian predators. Birds learn to avoid a colour signal faster when individual prey possesses one of two unpalatable chemicals rather than all prey having the same defence chemical. However, for chemical polymorphisms to evolve within a species, there must be benefits that allow rare chemical morphs to increase in frequency. Using domestic chicks as predators and coloured crumbs for prey, we provide evidence that birds taste and reject proportionally more of the individuals with rare defence chemicals than those with common defence chemicals. This indicates that the way in which birds attack and reject prey could enhance the survival of rare chemical morphs and select for chemical polymorphism in aposematic species. This is the first experiment to demonstrate that predators can directly influence the form taken by prey's chemical defences.

摘要

具有化学防御能力的昆虫会利用醒目的警戒色向鸟类捕食者表明自己不可口,捕食者会学会避开它们。昆虫在防御中会利用各种各样不同的化合物,而且防御化学物质的种内变异很常见。我们提出,昆虫防御化学物质的多态性可能通过提高躲避鸟类捕食者的存活率而对昆虫有益。当个体猎物拥有两种不可口化学物质之一,而不是所有猎物都具有相同的防御化学物质时,鸟类会更快地学会避开一种颜色信号。然而,要使化学多态性在一个物种内进化,必须存在能让稀有的化学形态增加频率的益处。我们以家鸡作为捕食者,彩色面包屑作为猎物,提供了证据表明,与具有常见防御化学物质的个体相比,鸟类品尝并拒绝具有稀有防御化学物质的个体的比例更高。这表明鸟类攻击和拒绝猎物的方式可能会提高稀有化学形态的存活率,并促使警戒色物种形成化学多态性。这是第一个证明捕食者能够直接影响猎物化学防御形式的实验。

相似文献

1
Frequency-dependent taste-rejection by avian predation may select for defence chemical polymorphisms in aposematic prey.鸟类捕食导致的频率依赖性味觉排斥可能会促使具有警戒色的猎物在防御性化学物质方面产生多态性。
Biol Lett. 2005 Dec 22;1(4):500-3. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.0359.
2
Avian predators taste-reject aposematic prey on the basis of their chemical defence.猛禽会根据化学防御机制对具有警戒色的猎物产生味觉排斥。
Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):348-50. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0483.
3
Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.当聚集在一起时,食虫鸟类会更猛烈地攻击具有警戒色的猎物。
Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):488-90. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0522.
4
Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive.宁要熟悉的魔鬼:鸟类捕食者发现猎物毒性的变化令人厌恶。
Biol Lett. 2014 Nov;10(11):20140533. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0533.
5
Tasting the difference: do multiple defence chemicals interact in Müllerian mimicry?品味差异:多种防御性化学物质在缪勒拟态中会相互作用吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 7;272(1560):339-45. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2953.
6
Predators' toxin burdens influence their strategic decisions to eat toxic prey.捕食者的毒素负荷会影响它们捕食有毒猎物的战略决策。
Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):1479-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.064. Epub 2007 Aug 23.
7
Taste-rejection behaviour by predators can promote variability in prey defences.捕食者的味觉排斥行为可以促进猎物防御的多样性。
Biol Lett. 2010 Oct 23;6(5):617-9. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0153. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
8
Avian predators taste reject mimetic prey in relation to their signal reliability.鸟类捕食者会根据信号的可靠性来品尝拒绝模拟猎物。
Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 11;12(1):2334. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05600-5.
9
Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey.对新型罕见警戒色猎物的强烈反拟态选择。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 31;98(16):9181-4. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161071598. Epub 2001 Jul 17.
10
Birds learn to use distastefulness as a signal of toxicity.鸟类学会将难吃作为毒性的信号。
Proc Biol Sci. 2010 Jun 7;277(1688):1729-34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.2092. Epub 2010 Feb 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Is temporal synchrony necessary for effective Batesian mimicry?有效的贝氏拟态是否需要时间同步?
Proc Biol Sci. 2025 Jan;292(2039):20241737. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1737. Epub 2025 Jan 22.
2
Condition dependence in biosynthesized chemical defenses of an aposematic and mimetic butterfly.一只警戒色和拟态蝴蝶生物合成化学防御中的条件依赖性
Ecol Evol. 2022 Jun 24;12(6):e9041. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9041. eCollection 2022 Jul.
3
Activation of the Nucleus Taeniae of the Amygdala by Umami Taste in Domestic Chicks ().鲜味对家鸡杏仁核带状核的激活作用() 。 (括号内内容原文缺失,翻译时保留原样)
Front Physiol. 2022 May 26;13:897931. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.897931. eCollection 2022.
4
Evolutionary and ecological processes influencing chemical defense variation in an aposematic and mimetic butterfly.影响一种警戒色和拟态蝴蝶化学防御变异的进化与生态过程。
PeerJ. 2021 Jun 18;9:e11523. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11523. eCollection 2021.
5
Better the devil you know: avian predators find variation in prey toxicity aversive.宁要熟悉的魔鬼:鸟类捕食者发现猎物毒性的变化令人厌恶。
Biol Lett. 2014 Nov;10(11):20140533. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2014.0533.
6
Conformational and functional effects induced by D- and L-amino acid epimerization on a single gene encoded peptide from the skin secretion of Hypsiboas punctatus.由 D-和 L-氨基酸差向异构化引起的构象和功能效应对 Hypsiboas punctatus 皮肤分泌物中单个基因编码肽的影响。
PLoS One. 2013;8(4):e59255. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059255. Epub 2013 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
SURVIVAL OF DISTASTEFUL INSECTS AFTER BEING ATTACKED BY NAIVE BIRDS: A REAPPRAISAL OF THE THEORY OF APOSEMATIC COLORATION EVOLVING THROUGH INDIVIDUAL SELECTION.被未接触过的鸟类攻击后难吃昆虫的存活:对通过个体选择进化的警戒色理论的重新评估
Evolution. 1982 Sep;36(5):998-1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1982.tb05468.x.
2
Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug.具有警戒色的难吃虫子比具有保护色的虫子有更高的存活率。
Oecologia. 1985 Oct;67(3):411-415. doi: 10.1007/BF00384948.
3
Plant-determined variation in the cardenolide content, thin-layer chromatography profiles, and emetic potency of monarch butterflies,Danaus plexippus L. Reared on milkweed plants in California: 2.Asclepias speciosa.植物决定的加利福尼亚地区马利筋草饲养的帝王蝶幼虫(Danaus plexippus L.)体内的强心甾内酯含量、薄层层析图谱和催吐效力的变化:2. 美丽马利筋(Asclepias speciosa)。
J Chem Ecol. 1984 Apr;10(4):601-39. doi: 10.1007/BF00994224.
4
Selective predation on chemically defended chrysomelid larvae : A Conditioning Process.对具化学防御的叶甲幼虫的选择性捕食:一个适应过程。
J Chem Ecol. 1984 Dec;10(12):1693-700. doi: 10.1007/BF00987355.
5
Genetic component of variation in chemical defense ofOreina gloriosa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).Oreina gloriosa(鞘翅目:叶甲科)化学防御的遗传变异。
J Chem Ecol. 1992 Aug;18(8):1375-87. doi: 10.1007/BF00994363.
6
Distribution of autogenous and host-derived chemical defenses inOreina leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae).Oreina 叶甲(鞘翅目:叶甲科)中自体和宿主来源的化学防御物质的分布。
J Chem Ecol. 1995 Aug;21(8):1163-79. doi: 10.1007/BF02228318.
7
Tasting the difference: do multiple defence chemicals interact in Müllerian mimicry?品味差异:多种防御性化学物质在缪勒拟态中会相互作用吗?
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 7;272(1560):339-45. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2953.
8
Automimicry destabilizes aposematism: predator sample-and-reject behaviour may provide a solution.自动拟态破坏了警戒色:捕食者的采样与拒绝行为或许能提供一种解决方案。
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 22;271(1557):2621-5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2893.