De Sutter An, Lemiengre Marieke, Van Maele Georges, van Driel Mieke, De Meyere Marc, Christiaens Thierry, De Maeseneer Jan
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Ghent University, Ghent University Hospital, 1K3, De Pintelaan, 185, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Ann Fam Med. 2006 Nov-Dec;4(6):486-93. doi: 10.1370/afm.600.
In evaluating complaints suggestive of rhinosinusitis, family physicians have to rely chiefly on the findings of a history, a physical examination, and plain radiographs. Yet, evidence of the value of signs, symptoms, or radiographs in the management of these patients is sparse. We aimed to determine whether clinical signs and symptoms or radiographic findings can predict the duration of the illness, the effect of antibiotic treatment, or both.
We analyzed data from 300 patients with rhinosinusitis-like complaints participating in a randomized controlled trial comparing amoxicillin with placebo. We used Cox regression analysis to assess the association between the presence at baseline of rhinosinusitis signs and symptoms or an abnormal radiograph and the subsequent course of the illness. We then tested for interactions to assess whether the presence of any of these findings predicted a beneficial effect of antibiotic treatment.
Two factors at baseline were independently associated with a prolonged course of the illness: a general feeling of illness (hazard ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval, 0.60-0.99) and reduced productivity (hazard ratio = 0.68, 95% confidence interval, 0.53-0.88). Neither typical sinusitis signs and symptoms nor abnormal radiographs had any prognostic value. Prognosis remained unchanged whether or not patients were treated with antibiotics, no matter what symptoms patients had at baseline.
In a large group of average patients with rhinosinusitis, neither the presence of typical signs or symptoms nor an abnormal radiograph provided information with regard to the prognosis or the effect of amoxicillin. The time to recovery was longer in patients who felt ill at baseline or who did not feel able to work, but the course of their illness was not influenced by antibiotic treatment.
在评估疑似鼻窦炎的症状时,家庭医生主要依赖病史、体格检查和普通X光片的检查结果。然而,关于这些体征、症状或X光片检查结果在这些患者治疗中的价值的证据却很少。我们旨在确定临床体征和症状或X光片检查结果是否能够预测疾病的持续时间、抗生素治疗的效果,或两者皆可预测。
我们分析了300名有鼻窦炎样症状的患者的数据,这些患者参与了一项比较阿莫西林与安慰剂的随机对照试验。我们使用Cox回归分析来评估鼻窦炎体征和症状或X光片异常在基线时的存在与疾病后续病程之间的关联。然后我们进行交互作用检验,以评估这些发现中的任何一项是否能预测抗生素治疗的有益效果。
基线时的两个因素与疾病病程延长独立相关:全身不适(风险比=0.77,95%置信区间,0.60-0.99)和生产力下降(风险比=0.68,95%置信区间,0.53-0.88)。典型的鼻窦炎体征和症状以及X光片异常均无任何预后价值。无论患者是否接受抗生素治疗,无论患者基线时出现何种症状,预后均保持不变。
在一大群普通的鼻窦炎患者中,典型体征或症状的存在以及X光片异常均未提供有关阿莫西林预后或疗效的信息。基线时感觉不适或无法工作的患者恢复时间更长,但他们的疾病进程不受抗生素治疗的影响。