Ude-Koeller Susanne, Muller Luise, Wiesemann Claudia
Abteilung Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Georg-August-Universitat Gottingen, Humboldtallee 36, 37073 Gottingen, Germany.
Ethik Med. 2006 Mar;18(1):63-70. doi: 10.1007/s00481-006-0414-1.
Ethical guidelines for the treatment of newborns with disorders of sex development have come under critical discussion. Former patients urgently demand a reassessment of surgical genital corrections, arguing that modern societies are more willing to tolerate sexual ambiguity and that clear-cut gender differences are becoming less and less important.
The growing children's rights movement has stressed the fact that children are not just objects of their parents and society's expectations. The limits of parental decision making in case of sexual ambiguity are an object of ongoing controversies. We discuss the relative authority of parents' wishes in the determination of the newborn child's sex.
We reject a purely autonomy based approach. Our arguments are based on a relational ethics of parenthood.
关于性发育障碍新生儿治疗的伦理准则受到了批判性讨论。曾经接受过治疗的患者迫切要求重新评估生殖器矫正手术,他们认为现代社会更愿意容忍性别的模糊性,明确的性别差异正变得越来越不重要。
不断发展的儿童权利运动强调了这样一个事实,即儿童不仅仅是父母和社会期望的对象。在性特征模糊的情况下,父母决策的局限性一直是争议的焦点。我们讨论了父母意愿在确定新生儿性别的相对权威性。
我们反对纯粹基于自主权的方法。我们的论点基于一种亲子关系的伦理观。