Vogt N, Englhardt A
Med Klin. 1975 Nov 14;70(46):1871-7.
Plasma lipoprotein patterns currently employed in attempts to identify different forms of hyperlipoproteinemia have been investigated in 113 hospitalized diabetics. For classification two methods have been compared: The first is based on lipid electrophoresis pattern in agarose gel coupled with the measurement of triglycerides and cholesterol. The second is based on plasma lipoprotein pattern obtained by separation of lipoproteins on cellulose acetate and following densitometry combined with estimation of cholesterol and beta-cholesterol and triglycerides in plasma. It could be demonstrated, that the results obtained in agarose system are not convertible to data obtained with the method for quantifying lipoproteins. By quantitative analysis only 4 p.c. of diabetics had type IIa, 4 p.c. type V, the others type IIb or IV. Graphic plots and calculated concentrations of lipoproteins gave differences in lipoprotein profiles between compensated and acidotic diabetics. In diabetes stage 1 most values are in the normal range, in stage 2 prebetalipoproteins increase and betalipoproteins decrease. In some case betalipoproteins are elevated and prebetalipoproteins diminished. In stage 3 with metabolic acidosis we observed an altered lipoprotein profile with confluence of beta- and prebeta-peak. The calculated concentration profile was also different from the others and revealed no certain quantitative information described for other electropherograms containing alpha, beta- and prebeta-bands. This phenomenon was frequently observed in patients with acute viral hepatitis and severe chronic liver disease. The pattern in diabetics is representative for patients with an excess of plasma lipids (the 2.5 fold of normal values in the mean). It is characterised as a broad beta band on the electropherogram similar to type III pattern. Presence of beta migrating lipoproteins in the ultracentrifugal supernatand fraction of d = 1006 could not be demonstrated.
对113例住院糖尿病患者进行了研究,这些患者目前采用血浆脂蛋白模式来试图识别不同类型的高脂蛋白血症。为了进行分类,比较了两种方法:第一种基于琼脂糖凝胶中的脂质电泳模式并结合甘油三酯和胆固醇的测量;第二种基于通过在醋酸纤维素上分离脂蛋白并进行密度测定,再结合血浆中胆固醇、β-胆固醇和甘油三酯的估计而获得的血浆脂蛋白模式。结果表明,琼脂糖系统获得的结果无法转换为定量脂蛋白方法获得的数据。通过定量分析,只有4%的糖尿病患者为IIa型,4%为V型,其他为IIb型或IV型。脂蛋白的图表和计算浓度显示,代偿性和酸中毒性糖尿病患者的脂蛋白谱存在差异。在糖尿病1期,大多数值在正常范围内,在2期前β-脂蛋白增加,β-脂蛋白减少。在某些情况下,β-脂蛋白升高,前β-脂蛋白减少。在伴有代谢性酸中毒的3期,我们观察到脂蛋白谱发生改变,β峰和前β峰融合。计算出的浓度谱也与其他谱不同,并且没有揭示出其他包含α、β和前β带的电泳图所描述的特定定量信息。这种现象在急性病毒性肝炎和严重慢性肝病患者中经常观察到。糖尿病患者的模式代表了血浆脂质过多的患者(平均值为正常值的2.5倍)。其特征是电泳图上有一条宽的β带,类似于III型模式。在d = 1006的超速离心上清液部分中未证实存在β迁移脂蛋白。