Eviö Sirpa, Pekkarinen Tuula, Sintonen Harri, Tiitinen Aila, Välimäki Matti J
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, PB 140, 00029 Helsinki, Finland.
Maturitas. 2007 Feb 20;56(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2006.06.009. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
The purpose of this study was to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of elderly users and non-users of hormone therapy (HT).
Subjects were participants in an ongoing intervention study, which is aimed at elucidating the effectiveness of an educational program in the prevention of osteoporosis. A random sample (n=4200) of the female population in Southern Finland within the age group of 60-70 years was drawn from the population register and invited to take part in the trial; 2181 (52%) accepted the invitation and were randomized either to the educational program or to a control group. In 2002 all 2181 participants were asked by a postal survey about HRQoL (generic15D), education, profession, climacteric symptoms, use of HT, chronic diseases and medication. Of the 1663 respondents (76% of the participants; 40% of the original cohort) 585 (mean age 67.5 years) were HT users and 1078 (mean age 68.9 years) non-users.
After standardizing for age, education, number of continuous medication and ongoing diseases HRQoL of HT users was significantly better on the dimensions of usual activities, vitality and sexual activity. The effect of HT on overall HRQoL on a 0-1 scale was positive, but neither statistically significant nor clinically important. The number of medication and diseases had a statistically significant negative effect, but higher education a positive, but statistically non-significant effect on HRQoL overall.
Among elderly women HT use has a statistically significant positive effect on some dimensions of HRQoL, but not on HRQoL overall. To improve HRQoL is not an indication for elderly postmenopausal women to use HT.
本研究旨在比较老年激素疗法(HT)使用者与非使用者的健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。
研究对象为一项正在进行的干预研究的参与者,该研究旨在阐明一项预防骨质疏松症教育项目的效果。从芬兰南部60至70岁女性人群的人口登记册中随机抽取样本(n = 4200),并邀请她们参加试验;2181人(52%)接受邀请,被随机分为教育项目组或对照组。2002年,通过邮政调查询问了所有2181名参与者的HRQoL(通用15D量表)、教育程度、职业、更年期症状、HT使用情况、慢性病和用药情况。在1663名受访者中(占参与者的76%;占原始队列的40%),585人(平均年龄67.5岁)为HT使用者,1078人(平均年龄68.9岁)为非使用者。
在对年龄、教育程度、连续用药数量和现有疾病进行标准化后,HT使用者在日常活动、活力和性活动方面的HRQoL明显更好。HT对0至1量表上的总体HRQoL的影响是积极的,但在统计学上不显著,在临床上也不重要。用药数量和疾病对HRQoL总体有统计学上显著的负面影响,但高等教育对HRQoL总体有积极影响,但在统计学上不显著。
在老年女性中,使用HT对HRQoL的某些方面有统计学上显著的积极影响,但对总体HRQoL没有影响。改善HRQoL并非老年绝经后女性使用HT的指征。