Waring Justin J
School of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, UK.
Health (London). 2007 Jan;11(1):29-46. doi: 10.1177/1363459307070801.
'Systems thinking' is an important feature of the emerging 'patient safety' agenda. As a key component of a 'safety culture', it encourages clinicians to look past individual error to recognize the latent factors that threaten safety. This article investigates whether current medical thinking is commensurate with the idea of 'systems thinking' together with its implications for policy. The findings are based on qualitative semi-structured interviews with specialist physicians working within one NHS District General Hospital in the English Midlands. It is shown that, rather then favouring an individualized or 'person-centred' perspective, doctors readily identify 'the system' as a threat to patient safety. This is not necessarily a reflection of the prevailing safety discourse or knowledge of policy, but reflects a tacit understanding of how services are (dis)organized. This line of thinking serves to mitigate individual wrongdoing and protect professional credibility by encouraging doctors to accept and accommodate the shortcomings of the system, rather than participate in new forms of organizational learning.
“系统思维”是新兴的“患者安全”议程的一个重要特征。作为“安全文化”的一个关键组成部分,它鼓励临床医生超越个体错误,去认识那些威胁安全的潜在因素。本文探讨当前的医学思维是否与“系统思维”理念相符及其对政策的影响。研究结果基于对英格兰中部一家国民保健服务(NHS)区级综合医院的专科医生进行的定性半结构化访谈。结果显示,医生们并非倾向于个体化或“以人为本”的视角,而是 readily 将“系统”视为对患者安全的威胁。这不一定反映了当前盛行的安全话语或政策知识,而是反映了对服务如何(未)组织的一种默契理解。这种思维方式有助于减轻个体的不当行为,并通过鼓励医生接受和适应系统的缺点来保护专业信誉,而不是参与新形式的组织学习。 (注:原文中“readily”未翻译完整,可能是拼写有误,推测应为“readily”,意为“容易地;乐意地” )