Suppr超能文献

“骑士”还是“无赖”?公共政策、专业权力与产科服务改革

"Knights" or "knaves"? Public policy, professional power, and reforming maternity services.

作者信息

Reiger Kerreen M

机构信息

School of Social Sciences, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.

出版信息

Health Care Women Int. 2011 Jan;32(1):2-22. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2010.529218.

Abstract

Recent quality and safety discourse stresses locating "human errors and mistakes" within an institutional framework. I go further to contend that, in spite of well-meaning individual practitioners, aspects of a powerful, self-interested obstetric professional culture pose a major barrier to quality childbirth care. Using my analysis, I contrast the profession's "knightly" self-image with critical scholarship, and it examine evidence given to public inquiries into obstetric misdemeanors and mistakes in Australia, England, and Ireland. Policy incentives to reform maternity care need to go beyond technical auditing measures to foster collaboration, social as well as institutional accountability, and critical self-reflection within the obstetric profession.

摘要

近期关于质量与安全的讨论强调将“人为错误”置于制度框架内。我进一步认为,尽管从业者个人本意良好,但强大且利己的产科专业文化的某些方面对高质量分娩护理构成了重大障碍。通过我的分析,我将该行业的“骑士般”自我形象与批判性学术研究进行了对比,并审视了澳大利亚、英国和爱尔兰针对产科不当行为和失误进行公开调查时所提供的证据。改革产科护理的政策激励措施需要超越技术审计措施,以促进产科行业内部的合作、社会及制度问责以及批判性的自我反思。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验