Reynolds Matthew R, Lavelle Tara, Essebag Vidal, Cohen David J, Zimetbaum Peter
Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, 185 Pilgrim Road/Baker 4, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Am Heart J. 2006 Dec;152(6):1097-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.08.011.
Most quality of life (QoL) data in AF have been collected from clinical trial patients. We sought to characterize symptoms and QoL in a large inception cohort of unselected patients with AF and explore the impact of age, sex, and AF clinical course on QoL measures over time.
We collected symptom and QoL data on 963 patients with new onset AF enrolled in a multicenter observational registry. Patients were primarily managed with pharmacologic therapy and cardioversion. Quality of life instruments including the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12, University of Toronto AF Severity Scale, and the AF Symptom Checklist were completed at baseline and repeated over 2.5 years. Time-weighted QoL summary scores over the first year were calculated for each patient. Factors associated with those summary scores were explored in multivariable analyses.
Quality of life was moderately impaired at baseline, but quickly approached population norms and remained stable thereafter. After multivariable adjustment, female sex was strongly associated with higher symptom scores and lower QoL scores. Older (age >65 years) patients reported less prominent disease-specific impairment in QoL than younger patients. In part because 73% of patients appeared to maintain sinus rhythm for the first year, AF clinical course had a comparatively small impact on QoL during this timeframe.
Quality of life is impaired in newly diagnosed patients with AF, but improves to normal levels with standard treatments. Within the first year after diagnosis, sex, age, and comorbid conditions are more strongly associated with QoL outcomes than the clinical course of AF itself.
大多数房颤患者的生活质量(QoL)数据是从临床试验患者中收集的。我们试图描述一大群未经选择的房颤患者的症状和生活质量,并探讨年龄、性别和房颤临床病程随时间对生活质量指标的影响。
我们收集了963例新发房颤患者的症状和生活质量数据,这些患者参与了一项多中心观察性注册研究。患者主要接受药物治疗和心脏复律。生活质量评估工具包括医学结局研究简表-12、多伦多大学房颤严重程度量表和房颤症状清单,在基线时完成,并在2.5年期间重复进行。计算了每位患者第一年的时间加权生活质量总结评分。在多变量分析中探讨了与这些总结评分相关的因素。
生活质量在基线时中度受损,但很快接近人群正常水平,此后保持稳定。经过多变量调整后,女性与较高的症状评分和较低的生活质量评分密切相关。年龄较大(>65岁)的患者报告的生活质量中特定疾病损害不如年轻患者明显。部分原因是73%的患者在第一年似乎维持窦性心律,在此期间房颤临床病程对生活质量的影响相对较小。
新诊断的房颤患者生活质量受损,但通过标准治疗可改善至正常水平。在诊断后的第一年内,性别、年龄和合并症与生活质量结果的关联比房颤本身的临床病程更强。