Torzewski Michael, Lackner Karl J
Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44(12):1389-94. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2006.259.
Atherosclerosis is widely regarded as a chronic inflammatory disease that develops as a consequence of entrapment of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in the arterial intima. Native LDL lacks inflammatory properties, so the lipoprotein must undergo biochemical alterations to become atherogenic. Among several other candidates, two different concepts of lipoprotein modification are propagated, the widespread oxidation hypothesis and the less common E-LDL hypothesis, which proposes that modification of LDL occurs through the action of ubiquitous hydrolytic enzymes (enzymatically modified LDL or E-LDL) rather than oxidation. By clearly distinguishing between the initiation and progression of atherosclerotic lesion development, this article reviews comparative studies of both types of lipoprotein modification and submits a viewpoint for discussion proposing that these lipoprotein modifications do not really compete, but rather complement one another. According to this concept, E-LDL might be more important for the initiation of atherosclerosis, while oxidative modification of LDL might be more helpful for diagnosis and prognosis of the disease.
动脉粥样硬化被广泛认为是一种慢性炎症性疾病,它是由于低密度脂蛋白(LDL)滞留于动脉内膜而引发的。天然LDL不具备炎症特性,因此这种脂蛋白必须经历生化改变才能具有致动脉粥样硬化性。在其他几种可能性中,有两种不同的脂蛋白修饰概念被提出,一种是广为流传的氧化假说,另一种是不太常见的E-LDL假说,该假说认为LDL的修饰是通过普遍存在的水解酶的作用(酶修饰LDL或E-LDL)而非氧化作用发生的。通过明确区分动脉粥样硬化病变发展的起始和进展过程,本文综述了这两种脂蛋白修饰的比较研究,并提出一个供讨论的观点,即这些脂蛋白修饰并非真正相互竞争,而是相互补充。根据这一概念,E-LDL可能对动脉粥样硬化的起始更为重要,而LDL的氧化修饰可能对该疾病的诊断和预后更有帮助。