Gao Q, X Chen M, Yao W J, Gao Y, Song Y, Wang G T, Wang M X, Nie P
State Key Laboratory of Freshwater Ecology and Biotechnology, and Laboratory of Fish Diseases, Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei Province, 430072, China.
Parasitology. 2007 May;134(Pt 5):695-703. doi: 10.1017/S0031182006001971. Epub 2006 Dec 14.
The phylogenetic relationship of 5 genera, i.e. Diplozoon Nordmann, 1832, Paradiplozoon Achmerov, 1974, Inustiatus Khotenovsky, 1978, Sindiplozoon Khotenovsky, 1981, and Eudiplozoon Khotenovsky, 1985 in the subfamily Diplozoinae Palombi, 1949 (Monogenea, Polyopisthocotylea) was inferred from rDNA ITS-2 region using neighbour-joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian methods. The phylogenetic trees produced by using NJ, ML and Bayesian methods exhibit essentially the same topology. Surprisingly, freshwater species of Paradiplozoon from Europe clustered together with species of Diplozoon, but separated from Chinese Paradiplozoon species. The results of molecular phylogeny and lower level of divergence (4.1-15.7%) in ITS-2 rDNA among Paradiplozoon from Europe and Diplozoon and, on the other hand, high level of divergence (45.3-53.7%) among Paradiplozoon species from Europe and China might indicate the non-monophyletic origin of the genus Paradiplozoon. Also, the generic status of European Paradiplozoon needs to be revised. The species of Paradiplozoon in China is a basal group in Diplozoinae as revealed by NJ and Bayesian methods, and Sindiplozoon appears to be closely related to European Paradiplozoon and Diplozoon with their relationship to Eudiplozoon and Inustiatus being unresolved.
利用邻接法(NJ)、最大似然法(ML)和贝叶斯方法,从核糖体DNA ITS - 2区域推断了1949年帕洛姆比双殖亚科(单殖纲,多后盘目)中5个属的系统发育关系,这5个属分别是1832年的双身虫属(Diplozoon Nordmann)、1974年的副双身虫属(Paradiplozoon Achmerov)、1978年的内双身虫属(Inustiatus Khotenovsky)、1981年的辛氏双身虫属(Sindiplozoon Khotenovsky)以及1985年的真双身虫属(Eudiplozoon Khotenovsky)。采用NJ、ML和贝叶斯方法构建的系统发育树呈现出基本相同的拓扑结构。令人惊讶的是,来自欧洲的淡水副双身虫物种与双身虫属的物种聚集在一起,但与中国的副双身虫物种分开。欧洲副双身虫与双身虫属之间ITS - 2核糖体DNA的分子系统发育结果和较低的分歧水平(4.1 - 15.7%),另一方面,欧洲和中国的副双身虫物种之间较高的分歧水平(45.3 - 53.7%),可能表明副双身虫属的起源并非单系起源。此外,欧洲副双身虫的属级地位需要修订。NJ和贝叶斯方法显示,中国的副双身虫物种是双殖亚科中的一个基部类群,辛氏双身虫似乎与欧洲的副双身虫和双身虫关系密切,而它们与真双身虫属和内双身虫属的关系尚未明确。