• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用小鼠淋巴瘤细胞在体外评估玻璃离子水门汀的生物相容性。

Biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cements using mouse lymphoma cells in vitro.

作者信息

Ribeiro D A, Marques M E A, Salvadori D M F

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Federal University of Sao Paulo, UNIFESP, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Dec;33(12):912-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01658.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01658.x
PMID:17168933
Abstract

Glass-ionomer cements are widely used in dentistry as restorative materials and adhesives for composite restorations. A number of genotoxicity studies have been conducted using these materials with results conflicting so far. Thus, the approach was aimed to look at the genotoxic and cytotoxic potential of three different glass-ionomer cements available commercially (Ketac Cem, Ketac Molar and Vitrebond) by the single cell gel (comet) assay and trypan blue exclusion test, respectively. For this, such materials were exposed to mouse lymphoma cells in vitro for 1 h at 37 degrees C. Data were assessed by Kruskall-Wallis non-parametric test. The results showed that all powders assayed did not show genotoxic effects. On the other hand, the liquid from Vitrebond at 0.1% dilution caused an increase of DNA injury. Significant statistically differences (P < 0.05) in cytotoxicity provoked by all powders tested were observed for exposure at 1,000 micro g mL(-1) concentration and 100 micro g mL(-1) for Ketac Molar. With respect to liquids of glass-ionomer cements evaluated, the major toxic effect on cell viability was produced at 1%, beginning at the dilution of 0.5% for Vitrebond. Taken together, these results support the notion that some components of glass-ionomer cements show both genotoxic and cytotoxic effects in higher concentrations.

摘要

玻璃离子水门汀作为修复材料和复合修复体的黏合剂在牙科领域被广泛应用。目前已经开展了多项关于这些材料的遗传毒性研究,但结果相互矛盾。因此,本研究旨在分别通过单细胞凝胶(彗星)试验和台盼蓝排斥试验,研究三种市售不同玻璃离子水门汀(Ketac Cem、Ketac Molar和Vitrebond)的遗传毒性和细胞毒性潜力。为此,将这些材料在37℃下体外暴露于小鼠淋巴瘤细胞1小时。数据通过克鲁斯卡尔 - 沃利斯非参数检验进行评估。结果表明,所有检测的粉末均未显示出遗传毒性作用。另一方面,Vitrebond稀释至0.1%的液体导致DNA损伤增加。在1000μg/mL浓度下,所有测试粉末引发的细胞毒性存在显著统计学差异(P < 0.05),Ketac Molar在100μg/mL时也有差异。对于所评估的玻璃离子水门汀液体,对细胞活力的主要毒性作用在1%时产生,Vitrebond从0.5%的稀释度开始。综上所述,这些结果支持以下观点:玻璃离子水门汀的某些成分在较高浓度下表现出遗传毒性和细胞毒性作用。

相似文献

1
Biocompatibility of glass-ionomer cements using mouse lymphoma cells in vitro.使用小鼠淋巴瘤细胞在体外评估玻璃离子水门汀的生物相容性。
J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Dec;33(12):912-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01658.x.
2
Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of glass ionomer cements on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells.玻璃离子水门汀对中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞的遗传毒性和细胞毒性
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2006 Jun;17(6):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s10856-006-8931-5.
3
[Pulp toxicity of luting cements].[粘结水门汀的牙髓毒性]
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z. 1990 Nov;45(11):736-9.
4
In vitro assessment of cytotoxicity of resin-based dental restorative materials on WEHI 13 var fibroblasts.基于树脂的牙科修复材料对WEHI 13 var成纤维细胞细胞毒性的体外评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):13-6.
5
Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of mineral trioxide aggregate and regular and white Portland cements on Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells in vitro.三氧化矿物凝聚体以及普通和白色波特兰水泥对中国仓鼠卵巢(CHO)细胞的体外遗传毒性和细胞毒性
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006 Feb;101(2):258-61. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.02.080. Epub 2005 Oct 14.
6
[Comparative study on cytotoxicity of main components of three luting cements in vitro (author's transl)].
Shika Rikogaku Zasshi. 1981 Apr;22(59):172-86.
7
Effect of Different Concentrations of Chlorhexidine in Glass-ionomer Cements on In Vivo Biocompatibility.玻璃离子水门汀中不同浓度氯己定对体内生物相容性的影响。
J Adhes Dent. 2016;18(4):325-30. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a36512.
8
The hemolytic and cytotoxic properties of a zeolite-containing root filling material in vitro.
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003 Jan;95(1):101-8. doi: 10.1067/moe.2003.90.
9
Changes of cement properties caused by mixing errors: the therapeutic range of different cement types.混合误差导致的骨水泥性能变化:不同类型骨水泥的治疗范围
Dent Mater. 2008 Sep;24(9):1187-93. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.013. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
10
Biocompatibility studies on glass ionomer cements by primary cultures of human osteoblasts.用人成骨细胞原代培养物对玻璃离子水门汀进行生物相容性研究。
Biomaterials. 1996 Jul;17(13):1351-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Ceramic Materials and Technologies Applied to Digital Works in Implant-Supported Restorative Dentistry.应用于种植支持修复牙科数字作品的陶瓷材料与技术
Materials (Basel). 2020 Apr 22;13(8):1964. doi: 10.3390/ma13081964.
2
Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity induced by eluates from orthodontic glass ionomer cements in vitro.正畸玻璃离子水门汀洗脱液体外诱导的遗传毒性和细胞毒性
Saudi Dent J. 2018 Jan;30(1):38-42. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 24.
3
Evaluation of the Possible Neurotoxic Effect of the Bone Cement on the Facial Nerve: An Experimental Study.
骨水泥对面神经可能的神经毒性作用评估:一项实验研究。
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Sep;11(3):174-180. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2017.00864. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
4
Orthodontic cements induce genotoxicity and cytotoxicity in mammalian cells in vitro.正畸用粘结剂在体外对哺乳动物细胞具有遗传毒性和细胞毒性。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jul;9(4):393-8.
5
Biopure MTAD Induces DNA Damage but Not Cellular Death: An In Vitro Study.生物纯MTAD诱导DNA损伤但不导致细胞死亡:一项体外研究。
Eur J Dent. 2009 Oct;3(4):285-9.