Carr Jane L, Moffett Jennifer A Klaber, Sharp Donald M, Haines Derek R
Institute of Rehabilitation, University of Hull, UK.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Dec 14;7:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-101.
In the context of finite health resources, encouraging self-management of chronic conditions is important. Indeed, it is a key priority in the UK. An increasing number of self-management programmes are becoming available. However, patients may not always choose to participate in them. Some will prefer a more directed or medically orientated treatment. The acceptability of self-management programmes for patients suffering from chronic pain is an important issue. Few measures exist that examine the process of change to a self-management approach. The Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) was evaluated for this purpose in the present study. Hypotheses were centred around criterion and construct validity of the PSOCQ.
A sample of pain patients was surveyed about their interest in participating in a lay-led self-management programme ('the Expert Patients Programme'). In addition, participants completed two psychometric measures: the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) together with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). This is the first study as far as we are aware to examine these two scales together. The psychometric properties of the PSOCQ were examined. Analyses focused on the associations between the PSOCQ scores and interest in participating in the self-management programme. Further associations were examined between the PSOCQ and the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire.
The results demonstrated qualified support for the PSOCQ, in particular the Contemplation sub-scale. There was a significant positive association between interest and likelihood of joining the self-management programme and contemplation scores. The action and maintenance sub-scales appeared to be measuring a unitary dimension. The associations between the PSOCQ and the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire were in the directions predicted. The limitations of the study were discussed.
The results showed some support for the PSOCQ as a potentially useful tool in assessing who may or may not be likely to join a self-management course.
在卫生资源有限的情况下,鼓励慢性病的自我管理非常重要。事实上,这是英国的一个关键优先事项。越来越多的自我管理项目可供使用。然而,患者可能并不总是选择参与其中。有些人会更喜欢更具指导性或医学导向的治疗。慢性疼痛患者对自我管理项目的可接受性是一个重要问题。很少有措施来考察向自我管理方法转变的过程。本研究为此对疼痛变化阶段问卷(PSOCQ)进行了评估。假设围绕PSOCQ的标准效度和结构效度展开。
对一组疼痛患者进行调查,了解他们参与由非专业人员主导的自我管理项目(“专家患者项目”)的兴趣。此外,参与者还完成了两项心理测量指标:疼痛变化阶段问卷(PSOCQ)和慢性疼痛接受问卷(CPAQ)。据我们所知,这是第一项同时考察这两个量表的研究。对PSOCQ的心理测量特性进行了检验。分析重点在于PSOCQ分数与参与自我管理项目兴趣之间的关联。还考察了PSOCQ与慢性疼痛接受问卷之间的进一步关联。
结果对PSOCQ,尤其是沉思子量表提供了有限的支持。参与自我管理项目的兴趣和可能性与沉思分数之间存在显著的正相关。行动和维持子量表似乎在测量一个单一维度。PSOCQ与慢性疼痛接受问卷之间的关联符合预期方向。讨论了该研究的局限性。
结果显示PSOCQ作为评估谁可能或不太可能参加自我管理课程的潜在有用工具,得到了一些支持。