Suppr超能文献

疼痛变化阶段问卷(PSOCQ)是预测参与自我管理计划的有用工具吗?来自英国疼痛诊所患者样本的进一步效度证据。

Is the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) a useful tool for predicting participation in a self-management programme? Further evidence of validity, on a sample of UK pain clinic patients.

作者信息

Carr Jane L, Moffett Jennifer A Klaber, Sharp Donald M, Haines Derek R

机构信息

Institute of Rehabilitation, University of Hull, UK.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006 Dec 14;7:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-7-101.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the context of finite health resources, encouraging self-management of chronic conditions is important. Indeed, it is a key priority in the UK. An increasing number of self-management programmes are becoming available. However, patients may not always choose to participate in them. Some will prefer a more directed or medically orientated treatment. The acceptability of self-management programmes for patients suffering from chronic pain is an important issue. Few measures exist that examine the process of change to a self-management approach. The Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) was evaluated for this purpose in the present study. Hypotheses were centred around criterion and construct validity of the PSOCQ.

METHODS

A sample of pain patients was surveyed about their interest in participating in a lay-led self-management programme ('the Expert Patients Programme'). In addition, participants completed two psychometric measures: the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire (PSOCQ) together with the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ). This is the first study as far as we are aware to examine these two scales together. The psychometric properties of the PSOCQ were examined. Analyses focused on the associations between the PSOCQ scores and interest in participating in the self-management programme. Further associations were examined between the PSOCQ and the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated qualified support for the PSOCQ, in particular the Contemplation sub-scale. There was a significant positive association between interest and likelihood of joining the self-management programme and contemplation scores. The action and maintenance sub-scales appeared to be measuring a unitary dimension. The associations between the PSOCQ and the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire were in the directions predicted. The limitations of the study were discussed.

CONCLUSION

The results showed some support for the PSOCQ as a potentially useful tool in assessing who may or may not be likely to join a self-management course.

摘要

背景

在卫生资源有限的情况下,鼓励慢性病的自我管理非常重要。事实上,这是英国的一个关键优先事项。越来越多的自我管理项目可供使用。然而,患者可能并不总是选择参与其中。有些人会更喜欢更具指导性或医学导向的治疗。慢性疼痛患者对自我管理项目的可接受性是一个重要问题。很少有措施来考察向自我管理方法转变的过程。本研究为此对疼痛变化阶段问卷(PSOCQ)进行了评估。假设围绕PSOCQ的标准效度和结构效度展开。

方法

对一组疼痛患者进行调查,了解他们参与由非专业人员主导的自我管理项目(“专家患者项目”)的兴趣。此外,参与者还完成了两项心理测量指标:疼痛变化阶段问卷(PSOCQ)和慢性疼痛接受问卷(CPAQ)。据我们所知,这是第一项同时考察这两个量表的研究。对PSOCQ的心理测量特性进行了检验。分析重点在于PSOCQ分数与参与自我管理项目兴趣之间的关联。还考察了PSOCQ与慢性疼痛接受问卷之间的进一步关联。

结果

结果对PSOCQ,尤其是沉思子量表提供了有限的支持。参与自我管理项目的兴趣和可能性与沉思分数之间存在显著的正相关。行动和维持子量表似乎在测量一个单一维度。PSOCQ与慢性疼痛接受问卷之间的关联符合预期方向。讨论了该研究的局限性。

结论

结果显示PSOCQ作为评估谁可能或不太可能参加自我管理课程的潜在有用工具,得到了一些支持。

相似文献

7
Two brief versions of the multidimensional pain readiness to change questionnaire, version 2 (MPRCQ2).
Clin J Pain. 2009 Jan;25(1):48-57. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181817ab4.

引用本文的文献

1
What does collaborative healthcare for people with musculoskeletal-related conditions look like? A scoping review.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 4;26(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08814-6.
2
Mindfulness for people with chronic pain: Factors affecting engagement and suggestions for programme optimisation.
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1287-1307. doi: 10.1111/hex.13745. Epub 2023 Mar 12.
3
Lifestyle Medicine for Chronic Lower Back Pain: An Evidence-Based Approach.
Am J Lifestyle Med. 2021 Jul 21;15(4):425-433. doi: 10.1177/1559827620971547. eCollection 2021 Jul-Aug.
5
Japanese cross-cultural validation study of the Pain Stage of Change Questionnaire.
Pain Rep. 2019 Feb 7;4(2):e711. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000711. eCollection 2019 Mar-Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of social deprivation on chronic back pain outcomes.
Chronic Illn. 2005 Jun;1(2):121-9. doi: 10.1177/17423953050010020901.
2
Active self-management of chronic pain in the community.
Pain. 2005 Feb;113(3):249-250. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.11.005.
3
Social context and acceptance of chronic pain: the role of solicitous and punishing responses.
Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):155-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.10.004.
5
A critical review of the pain readiness to change model.
J Pain. 2004 Sep;5(7):357-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2004.06.005.
6
Acceptance and change in the context of chronic pain.
Pain. 2004 May;109(1-2):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2004.02.006.
7
Acceptance of chronic pain: component analysis and a revised assessment method.
Pain. 2004 Jan;107(1-2):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.012.
8
Cognitive-behavioral approach to the treatment of chronic pain patients.
Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003 Nov-Dec;28(6):573-9. doi: 10.1016/s1098-7339(03)00392-4.
9
Coping or acceptance: what to do about chronic pain?
Pain. 2003 Sep;105(1-2):197-204. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00202-1.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验