Perry Pauline
Nuffield Council on Bioethics, London, United Kingdom.
ILAR J. 2007;48(1):42-6. doi: 10.1093/ilar.48.1.42.
The Nuffield Council on Bioethics, an independent body in the United Kingdom, has published a 2005 report titled The Ethics of Research Involving Animals. The Report, produced by a Working Party that represented a wide range of views, seeks to clarify the debate that surrounds this topic and aims to help people identify and analyze the relevant scientific and ethical issues. The Working Party considered the arguments surrounding whether animal research yields useful results, and recommends that its predictability and transferability should be evaluated more fully, particularly in controversial areas. Commonly encountered ethical questions and arguments were considered in order to understand what lies behind disagreement on the moral justification of animal research. Four possible ethical positions on animal research, which represent points on a continuum, are described. Despite the range of views that exist among members of the Working Party, the Report presents a "Consensus Statement" that identifies agreement on several important issues. Building on this statement, recommendations are made for improving the quality of the debate and promoting the 3Rs (refinement, reduction, and replacement).
英国的独立机构纳菲尔德生物伦理委员会发布了一份2005年的报告,题为《涉及动物的研究伦理》。该报告由一个代表广泛观点的工作组撰写,旨在澄清围绕这一主题的辩论,并帮助人们识别和分析相关的科学和伦理问题。工作组考虑了关于动物研究是否能产生有用结果的各种论点,并建议应更全面地评估其可预测性和可转移性,尤其是在有争议的领域。为了理解动物研究道德合理性方面的分歧背后的原因,工作组审议了常见的伦理问题和论点。报告描述了关于动物研究的四种可能的伦理立场,它们代表了一个连续体上的不同点。尽管工作组的成员存在各种观点,但该报告提出了一份“共识声明”,确定了在几个重要问题上的一致意见。在此声明的基础上,报告提出了改进辩论质量和推广3R原则(优化、减少和替代)的建议。