Suppr超能文献

在一项具有全国代表性的调查人群中,评估家族史作为检测未诊断糖尿病的风险因素和筛查工具的情况。

Evaluation of family history as a risk factor and screening tool for detecting undiagnosed diabetes in a nationally representative survey population.

作者信息

Hariri Susan, Yoon Paula W, Moonesinghe Ramal, Valdez Rodolfo, Khoury Muin J

机构信息

Office of Workforce and Career Development, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

出版信息

Genet Med. 2006 Dec;8(12):752-9. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000250205.73963.f3.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We examined the utility of a three-level familial risk stratification system as a screening tool for diabetes in a nationally representative sample of the U.S. adult population.

METHODS

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data were used to assess the prevalence and distribution of familial risk for diabetes, the association between three levels of familial risk and undiagnosed diabetes, and the use of familial risk as a screening tool for diabetes, alone and in combination with body mass index and age.

RESULTS

The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 3% and increased with increasing familial risk (average = 2%, moderate = 4%, high = 10%). High familial risk was significantly associated with undiagnosed diabetes (adjusted odds ratio = 4.6; 95% confidence interval: 1.9-11.3). The use of a three-tiered familial risk stratification for diabetes screening yielded higher specificity (94%) and positive predictive value (9.9%) for high familial risk than body mass index > or = 25 (specificity = 38%, positive predictive value = 4.2%). High familial risk and body mass index > or = 25 combined had higher specificity (97%) and positive predictive value (13.4%); the addition of age > or = 45 years further improved positive predictive value (21.0%) without reducing specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a strong and proportional association between familial risk and undiagnosed diabetes, suggesting that a three-tiered assessment of familial diabetes risk may increase the effectiveness of diabetes screening.

摘要

目的

我们在美国成年人口的全国代表性样本中,检验了三级家族风险分层系统作为糖尿病筛查工具的效用。

方法

利用国家健康和营养检查调查数据评估糖尿病家族风险的患病率和分布、三级家族风险与未诊断糖尿病之间的关联,以及家族风险作为糖尿病筛查工具单独使用和与体重指数及年龄联合使用的情况。

结果

未诊断糖尿病的患病率为3%,且随着家族风险增加而升高(低风险=2%,中度风险=4%,高风险=10%)。高家族风险与未诊断糖尿病显著相关(调整优势比=4.6;95%置信区间:1.9-11.3)。对于高家族风险,使用三级家族风险分层进行糖尿病筛查比体重指数≥25具有更高的特异性(94%)和阳性预测值(9.9%)(特异性=38%,阳性预测值=4.2%)。高家族风险与体重指数≥25联合使用具有更高的特异性(97%)和阳性预测值(13.4%);增加年龄≥45岁进一步提高了阳性预测值(21.0%)且未降低特异性。

结论

家族风险与未诊断糖尿病之间存在强烈且成比例的关联,这表明对家族糖尿病风险进行三级评估可能会提高糖尿病筛查的有效性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验