Ibáñez Agustín
Universidad Diego Portales, Vergara, 275, Santiago de Chile.
Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2007 Jan;11(1):51-90.
The application of theories of complexity to the study of cognition has only recently started but it has already caused high expectations and controversies. Currently an extensive evaluation of the theoretical status of these theories does not exist. In an attempt to fill in that gap, this text develops a meta-theoretical analysis that presents a reconstruction of the theories of complexity applied to cognition, establishing their theoretical status, conceptual cores, basic assumptions and explanation strategies. Freeman's theory of cerebral chaos will be analyzed first. Then a meta-theory generalization to neuro-cognitive theories will be presented. It will be sustained that the central theoretical core of cognitive complexity theories are based on the metaphor of the mind, the brain or cognition as a dynamic system, founded a time-space topology. The framework of this study is based on ontology of processes and an ontological pluralism. The explicative strategies are supported by emergentistic approaches and nomological derivation based on mathematical laws. The prototypes of the theory are strongly backed up by computer simulations. This paper concludes by suggesting the existence of two antagonical perspectives (universalistic and pluralistic) in the core of these theories.
复杂性理论在认知研究中的应用只是最近才开始,但它已经引发了很高的期望和争议。目前,对这些理论的理论地位还没有进行广泛的评估。为了填补这一空白,本文进行了一项元理论分析,对应用于认知的复杂性理论进行了重构,确立了它们的理论地位、概念核心、基本假设和解释策略。首先将分析弗里曼的大脑混沌理论。然后将提出对神经认知理论的元理论概括。本文将坚持认为,认知复杂性理论的核心理论核心基于将心智、大脑或认知隐喻为一个动态系统,建立在时空拓扑学基础之上。本研究的框架基于过程本体论和本体多元论。解释策略得到了突现论方法和基于数学定律的法则推导的支持。这些理论的原型得到了计算机模拟的有力支持。本文最后指出,在这些理论的核心存在两种对立的观点(普遍主义和多元主义)。