Barutta Joaquín, Aravena Pía, Ibáñez Agustín
Laboratory of Epistemology and History of Medicine (LEPHIM), Instituto Universitario del Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2010 Jun;44(2):176-83. doi: 10.1007/s12124-010-9116-9.
In a recent paper called To think human out of the machine paradigm, it is stated that psychological science operates within a machine paradigm that is committed to mechanical causality. In addition, it is emphasizes the epistemological and methodological limitations of explanations based in deterministic mechanics and instead argues for the need of an 'organic paradigm' that takes into consideration psychological processes such as subjectivity, inter-subjectivity, and agency. Although there is no doubt that much psychological science has operated under a machine paradigm, we argue that recent psychological research is pursued using a wide variety of approaches and with an absence of a partially integrated meta-theoretical corpus. The present situation looks more like a Tower of Babel of epistemological approaches and empirical programs. The reconsideration of the organic paradigm and an explicitly addressed epistemological framework could constitute a step forward and lead to an explanatory pluralism built on greater dialogue within the psychological sciences.
在最近一篇名为《将人类思维从机器范式中解放出来》的论文中指出,心理科学在一种致力于机械因果关系的机器范式内运作。此外,该论文强调了基于决定论力学的解释在认识论和方法论上的局限性,转而主张需要一种“有机范式”,这种范式要考虑到诸如主体性、主体间性和能动性等心理过程。尽管毫无疑问,许多心理科学是在机器范式下运作的,但我们认为,最近的心理学研究采用了各种各样的方法,且缺乏一个部分整合的元理论体系。目前的情况看起来更像是认识论方法和实证项目的巴别塔。对有机范式的重新思考以及一个明确阐述的认识论框架可能会是向前迈出的一步,并导致在心理科学内部基于更多对话构建的解释多元论。