Gillett Grant
Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2006 Dec 19;1:13. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-1-13.
There is a fairly closed circle between culture, language, meaning, and truth such that the world of a given culture is a world understood in terms of the meanings produced in that culture. Medicine is, in fact, a subculture of a powerful type and has its own language and understanding of the range of illnesses that affect human beings. So how does medicine get at the truth of people and their ills in such a way as to escape its own limited constructions? There is a way out of the closed circle implicit in the idea of a praxis and the engagement with reality that is central to it and the further possibility introduced by Jacques Lacan that signification is never comprehensive in relation to the subject's encounter with the real. I will explore both of these so as to develop a conception of truth that is apt for the knowledge that arises in the clinic.
在文化、语言、意义和真理之间存在着一个相当封闭的循环,以至于特定文化的世界是一个依据该文化所产生的意义来理解的世界。事实上,医学是一种强大类型的亚文化,它有自己的语言以及对影响人类的一系列疾病的理解。那么,医学如何以一种方式触及人们及其疾病的真相,从而摆脱其自身有限的建构呢?有一种走出封闭循环的方法,它隐含在实践的理念以及与之核心相关的对现实的参与之中,还有雅克·拉康提出的进一步可能性,即就主体与实在的遭遇而言,意指永远是不全面的。我将探讨这两者,以便形成一种适合临床中产生的知识的真理概念。