• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[科学证据与话语生物伦理学]

[Scientific evidence and discourse bioethics].

作者信息

Pastor L M

机构信息

Departamento de Biología Celular e Histología, Universidad de Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100 Murcia, Spain.

出版信息

Cuad Bioet. 2009 Sep-Dec;20(70):453-69.

PMID:19799484
Abstract

This paper studies the relationship between the positive sciences, in particular the biomedical sciences, and bioethical discourse. Mainly addresses the question of whether bioethics requires adequate biomedical data for their development as science and that importance have such data in bioethical discourse. It also discusses the criteria that should govern relations between bioethics and biomedical fields. Before this is done a brief study of scientific rationality and the degree of truth that can achieve the empirical sciences coming to the conclusion that to determine it is necessary starting from a theory of knowledge. From what we have called epistemological realism we have valued the type of rationality that has biomedical sciences. Then from this rationality we have proposed the relationship must exist between the scientific evidence and development of bioethics. We conclude that bioethics needs the biomedical sciences to develop properly as a science but at the same time this does not mean that bioethics is reduced to biomedical science or derived from it. In development of bioethics is necessary the data biomedical but not sufficient, it is condition for the solution of problem or conflict studied but requires that this data is integrated into an eminently ethical reasoning.

摘要

本文研究实证科学,尤其是生物医学科学与生物伦理话语之间的关系。主要探讨生物伦理学作为一门科学发展是否需要充足的生物医学数据,以及这些数据在生物伦理话语中的重要性。还讨论了应规范生物伦理学与生物医学领域之间关系的标准。在此之前,先简要研究科学合理性以及实证科学能够达到的真理程度,得出结论认为有必要从一种知识理论出发来确定这一点。基于我们所谓的认识论实在论,我们评估了生物医学科学所具有的合理性类型。然后基于这种合理性,我们提出科学证据与生物伦理学发展之间必须存在联系。我们得出结论,生物伦理学需要生物医学科学来作为一门科学得到恰当发展,但这同时并不意味着生物伦理学就简化为生物医学科学或由其派生而来。在生物伦理学的发展中,生物医学数据是必要的,但并不充分,它是解决所研究问题或冲突的条件,但要求这些数据被整合到一种明显的伦理推理之中。

相似文献

1
[Scientific evidence and discourse bioethics].[科学证据与话语生物伦理学]
Cuad Bioet. 2009 Sep-Dec;20(70):453-69.
2
[Biomedical update in bioethics: a primordial ethical imperative].[生物伦理学中的生物医学新进展:一项首要的伦理要求]
Cuad Bioet. 2011 May-Aug;22(75):141-50.
3
New paths of medical ethics.医学伦理学的新路径。
Synth Philos. 1997;12(2):559-71.
4
[Medicine and truth: between science and narrative].[医学与真相:在科学与叙事之间]
Recenti Prog Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;100(7-8):365-70.
5
Bioethics as public discourse and second-order discipline.作为公共话语和二阶学科的生物伦理学。
J Med Philos. 2009 Jun;34(3):261-73. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhp019. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
6
Which naturalism for bioethics? A defense of moderate (pragmatic) naturalism.生物伦理学应采用哪种自然主义?为温和(实用主义)自然主义辩护。
Bioethics. 2008 Feb;22(2):92-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00604.x.
7
Medicine and the liberal arts: the bridge of ethics.医学与人文学科:伦理学之桥。
Ala J Med Sci. 1985;22(3):13-6.
8
Genomics and the conundrum of race: some epistemic and ethical considerations.基因组学与种族难题:一些认识论和伦理考量。
Perspect Biol Med. 2010 Summer;53(3):357-72. doi: 10.1353/pbm.0.0171.
9
A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work.一种评估科研工作中道德行为的新方法。
Account Res. 2003 Oct-Dec;10(4):205-28. doi: 10.1080/714906104.
10
Beyond integrating social sciences: Reflecting on the place of life sciences in empirical bioethics methodologies.超越整合社会科学:反思生命科学在实证生物伦理学方法中的地位。
Med Health Care Philos. 2018 Jun;21(2):207-214. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9792-z.