Smirnakis Stelios M, Schmid Michael C, Weber Bruno, Tolias Andreas S, Augath Mark, Logothetis Nikos K
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 38, Tübingen, Germany.
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007 Jun;27(6):1248-61. doi: 10.1038/sj.jcbfm.9600434. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
Intravascular contrast agents are used in functional magnetic resonance imaging to obtain cerebral blood volume (CBV) maps of cortical activity. Cerebral blood volume imaging with MION (monocrystalline-iron-oxide-nanoparticles) increases the sensitivity of functional imaging compared with the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal (Leite et al, 2002; Mandeville et al, 1998; Vanduffel et al, 2001). It therefore represents an attractive method for obtaining detailed maps of cortical organization (Vanduffel et al, 2001; Zhao et al, 2005). However, it remains to be determined how the spatial profile of CBV maps of cortical activity derived with MION compares with the profile of BOLD activation maps under a variety of different stimulation conditions. We used several stimulation paradigms to compare the spatial specificity of CBV versus BOLD activation maps in macaque area V1 at 4.7 T. We observed that: (1) CBV modulation is relatively stronger in deep cortical layers compared with BOLD, in agreement with studies in cats (Harel et al, 2006) and rodents (Lu et al, 2004; Mandeville and Marota, 1999) and (2) surprisingly, under large surround stimulation conditions, CBV maps extend along the cortical surface to cover large (>10 mm) regions of the cortex that are devoid of significant BOLD modulation. We conclude that the spatial profiles of BOLD and CBV activity maps do not coregister across all stimulus conditions, and therefore do not necessarily represent equivalent transforms of the neural response. Cerebral blood volume maps should be interpreted with care, in the context of the particular experimental paradigm applied.
血管内造影剂用于功能磁共振成像,以获取皮质活动的脑血容量(CBV)图。与血氧水平依赖(BOLD)信号相比,使用超顺磁性氧化铁纳米颗粒(MION)进行脑血容量成像可提高功能成像的灵敏度(莱特等人,2002年;曼德维尔等人,1998年;万杜费尔等人,2001年)。因此,它是获取皮质组织详细图谱的一种有吸引力的方法(万杜费尔等人,2001年;赵等人,2005年)。然而,在各种不同的刺激条件下,用MION得出的皮质活动CBV图的空间分布与BOLD激活图的分布相比如何,仍有待确定。我们使用了几种刺激范式,以比较在4.7T磁场下猕猴V1区CBV与BOLD激活图的空间特异性。我们观察到:(1)与BOLD相比,CBV调制在皮质深层相对更强,这与猫(哈雷尔等人,2006年)和啮齿动物(陆等人,2004年;曼德维尔和马罗塔,1999年)的研究结果一致;(2)令人惊讶的是,在大的周围刺激条件下,CBV图沿皮质表面延伸,覆盖皮质的大片(>10mm)区域,而这些区域没有明显的BOLD调制。我们得出结论,BOLD和CBV活动图的空间分布在所有刺激条件下并不完全重合,因此不一定代表神经反应的等效转换。在应用特定实验范式的背景下,应谨慎解释脑血容量图。