J Neurophysiol. 2021 Apr 1;125(4):1045-1057. doi: 10.1152/jn.00676.2020. Epub 2021 Feb 24.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measures blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) contrast that is generally assumed to be linearly related to excitatory neural activity. The positive hemodynamic response function (pHRF) is the positive BOLD response (PBR) evoked by a brief neural stimulation; the pHRF is often used as the impulse response for linear analysis of neural excitation. Many fMRI studies have observed a negative BOLD response (NBR) that is often associated with neural suppression. However, the temporal dynamics of the NBR evoked by a brief stimulus, the negative HRF (nHRF), remains unclear. Here, a unilateral visual stimulus was presented in a slow event-related design to elicit both pHRFs in the stimulus representation (SR), and nHRFs elsewhere. The observed nHRFs were not inverted versions of the pHRF previously reported. They were characterized by a stronger initial negative response followed by a significantly later positive peak. In contralateral primary visual cortex (V1), these differences varied with eccentricity from the SR. Similar nHRFs were observed in ipsilateral V1 with less eccentricity variation. Experiments with the blocked version of the same stimulus confirmed that brain regions presenting the unexpected nHRF dynamics correspond to those presenting a strong NBR. These data demonstrated that shift-invariant temporal linearity did not hold for the NBR while confirming that the PBR maintained rough linearity. Modeling indicated that the observed nHRFs can be created by suppression of both blood flow and oxygen metabolism. Critically, the nHRF can be misinterpreted as a pHRF due to their similarity, which could confound linear analysis for event-related fMRI experiments. We investigate dynamics of the negative hemodynamic response function (nHRF), the negative blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) response (NBR) evoked by a brief stimulus, in human early visual cortex. Here, we show that the nHRFs are not inverted versions of the corresponding pHRFs. The nHRF has complex dynamics that varied significantly with eccentricity. The results also show shift-invariant temporal linearity does not hold for the NBR.
功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量血氧水平依赖(BOLD)对比,通常假定与兴奋性神经活动呈线性相关。正血流动力学响应函数(pHRF)是短暂神经刺激引起的正 BOLD 响应(PBR);pHRF 通常用作线性分析神经兴奋的脉冲响应。许多 fMRI 研究观察到与神经抑制相关的负 BOLD 响应(NBR)。然而,短暂刺激引起的 NBR 的时间动态,即负 HRF(nHRF),尚不清楚。在这里,采用单侧视觉刺激在缓慢的事件相关设计中诱发刺激表示(SR)中的 pHRF 和其他地方的 nHRF。观察到的 nHRF 不是先前报道的 pHRF 的反转版本。它们的特点是初始负响应更强,随后出现明显的正峰值。在对侧初级视觉皮层(V1)中,这些差异随 SR 的偏心度而变化。在偏心度变化较小的同侧 V1 中观察到类似的 nHRF。相同刺激的块版本实验证实,呈现出人意料的 nHRF 动力学的脑区与呈现强 NBR 的脑区相对应。这些数据表明,在确认 PBR 保持大致线性的同时,NBR 不具有不变的时间线性。模型表明,由于它们的相似性,nHRF 可以通过抑制血流和氧代谢来创建。至关重要的是,nHRF 可能由于其相似性而被误解为 pHRF,这可能会混淆事件相关 fMRI 实验的线性分析。我们研究了人类早期视觉皮层中短暂刺激引起的负血流动力学响应函数(nHRF),即负血氧水平依赖(BOLD)响应(NBR)的动力学。在这里,我们表明 nHRF 不是相应 pHRF 的反转版本。nHRF 具有复杂的动力学,其随偏心度变化显著。结果还表明,NBR 不具有不变的时间线性。