Cherniack R M, Colby T V, Flint A, Thurlbeck W M, Waldron J, Ackerson L, King T E
Department of Medicine, National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine, Denver, CO 80206.
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991 Oct;144(4):892-900. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/144.4.892.
The diagnosis and classification of most interstitial lung diseases requires histologic evaluation of lung tissue, obtained by an open lung biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. In addition, it is generally accepted that response to therapy in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is related to the relative degree of cellularity and fibrosis present. Because only a qualitative assessment of the relative extent and severity of these changes is generally provided, correlation with clinical and physiologic alterations is difficult. This report describes results of a semiquantitative assessment by four pathologists of inflammatory/exudative changes, fibrotic/reparative changes, and airway alterations, in addition to an overall assessment of cellularity and fibrosis in 50 patients with IPF. In 10 randomly selected biopsies examined twice in a blinded fashion, absolute agreement between assessments for a given pathologist varied between 54 and 64% (mean = 57.5%) and in the majority of instances the agreement was greater than would have occurred by chance. There was good agreement for most variables across the four raters on the 101 samples. The mean score for some of the parameters reported by a given rater deviated occasionally from those of the other raters, but no single rater was consistently different from the other raters. A principal component factor analysis revealed that the pathologic features fell into four general groupings: alveolar wall metaplasia, fibrosis, honeycombing, smooth muscle, and vascular changes fell into one group; severity and extent of cellularity in the alveolar wall into a second group; severity and extent of cellularity in the alveolar space into a third group; and interstitial young connective tissue along with granulation tissue in the airways formed the fourth group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
大多数间质性肺疾病的诊断和分类需要对肺组织进行组织学评估,通常通过开胸肺活检获取肺组织以确诊。此外,人们普遍认为特发性肺纤维化(IPF)对治疗的反应与存在的细胞成分和纤维化的相对程度有关。由于通常仅对这些变化的相对程度和严重程度进行定性评估,因此难以将其与临床和生理改变相关联。本报告描述了四位病理学家对50例IPF患者的炎症/渗出性改变、纤维化/修复性改变和气道改变进行半定量评估的结果,以及对细胞成分和纤维化的总体评估结果。在以盲法对10例随机选择的活检组织进行两次检查时,给定病理学家的评估之间的绝对一致性在54%至64%之间(平均 = 57.5%),并且在大多数情况下,一致性大于随机发生的情况。在101个样本中,四位评估者对大多数变量的评估结果具有良好的一致性。给定评估者报告的某些参数的平均得分偶尔会与其他评估者的得分有所偏差,但没有一个评估者始终与其他评估者不同。主成分因子分析显示,病理特征分为四个一般类别:肺泡壁化生、纤维化、蜂窝状改变、平滑肌和血管改变归为一组;肺泡壁细胞成分的严重程度和范围归为第二组;肺泡腔内细胞成分的严重程度和范围归为第三组;气道中的间质年轻结缔组织以及肉芽组织形成第四组。(摘要截短为250字)