Smith Douglas C, Hall James A, Williams Julie K, An Hyonggin, Gotman Nathan
Project Iowa SCY, Department of Pediatrics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Am J Addict. 2006;15 Suppl 1:131-6. doi: 10.1080/10550490601006253.
Due to the continuing prevalence of adolescent substance abuse, promising treatment models need to be developed and evaluated. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of two promising models, Strengths Oriented Family Therapy (SOFT) and The Seven Challenges(R) (7C). Adolescents who qualified for outpatient treatment and agreed to participate in our study were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments and assessed at 3 and 6-months following baseline. Using a two-part, random-effects model, we examined the odds of achieving abstinence or full symptom remission between treatments and over time. For those not achieving full abstinence or full problem remission, we investigated whether frequency of use or symptom severity were reduced at follow-up. Participants in both SOFT and 7C demonstrated significant reductions in substance use and related problems, but treatments did not differ at 3 and 6 months following baseline. Overall, treatment services were delivered as planned. Both SOFT and 7C were efficacious with adolescents who abuse substances, as participants in both conditions were significantly more likely to be in symptom remission or abstinent at follow-up interviews versus at baseline. Replication studies are needed that address this study's limitations.
由于青少年药物滥用问题持续普遍存在,需要开发并评估有前景的治疗模式。因此,本研究的目的是评估两种有前景的模式,即优势导向家庭疗法(SOFT)和七项挑战疗法(7C)的疗效。符合门诊治疗条件并同意参与本研究的青少年被随机分配到两种治疗方法之一,并在基线后的3个月和6个月进行评估。使用两部分随机效应模型,我们研究了在不同治疗方法之间以及随着时间推移实现戒断或完全症状缓解的几率。对于那些未实现完全戒断或完全问题缓解的人,我们调查了随访时使用频率或症状严重程度是否降低。接受SOFT和7C治疗的参与者在药物使用和相关问题上均有显著减少,但在基线后的3个月和6个月,两种治疗方法没有差异。总体而言,治疗服务按计划提供。SOFT和7C对滥用药物的青少年均有效,因为与基线相比,两种情况下的参与者在随访访谈时症状缓解或戒断的可能性显著更高。需要进行复制研究以解决本研究的局限性。