Kushi Lawrence H, Kwan Marilyn L, Lee Marion M, Ambrosone Christine B
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA, USA.
J Nutr. 2007 Jan;137(1 Suppl):236S-242S. doi: 10.1093/jn/137.1.236S.
With increasing longevity and more effective cancer therapies, the population of cancer survivors is increasing. For example, it is estimated that there are over 2 million breast cancer survivors in the United States. Among cancer survivors and their families, there is substantial interest in whether there is anything that they can do beyond conventional therapy to improve their prognosis. Chief among these is interest in diet and use of complementary and alternative therapies. Despite this interest, there is surprisingly little that is known about the effects of these factors on cancer survival. This is in part because of the usual approach to research on diet and breast cancer in human populations. Studies that have had food and nutrition as a main interest have focused almost exclusively on cancer etiology and prevention; there are literally hundreds of such studies. Meanwhile, studies of populations after a breast cancer diagnosis have rarely considered lifestyle factors. Such studies have focused largely on therapeutics, such as effects of different chemotherapy regimens, or prognostic factors, such as the effects of stage of disease, hormone receptor status, or gene expression signatures on prognosis. To the extent that lifestyle factors have been a focus of cancer prognosis studies, they have often been aimed at the question of whether they impact quality of life, and not on whether they influence cancer survival or recurrence. There have been a handful of studies that have had lifestyle factors such as diet and physical activity as a principal focus. In addition to 2 randomized trials, the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study (WINS) and the Women's Healthy Eating and Living Study, there are at least 5 ongoing prospective cohort studies in breast cancer survivors that have diet as a main focus. Although these studies differ in various aspects, they are all aimed at examining whether differences in diet may result in differences in recurrence and mortality rates. One such study, the Pathways Study, is a prospective cohort study that began recruitment of study participants in early 2006. This study is unique in that it is enrolling women as soon after breast cancer diagnosis as is practical, whereas other studies have generally enrolled women after completion of adjuvant therapy or later. This and other studies promise to provide some of the first objective information regarding diet and breast cancer prognosis and serve as models for studies of diet and prognosis of other cancers.
随着寿命的延长和癌症治疗方法的日益有效,癌症幸存者的数量正在增加。例如,据估计美国有超过200万乳腺癌幸存者。在癌症幸存者及其家人中,他们对除了传统治疗之外是否还有其他方法可以改善预后有着浓厚的兴趣。其中最主要的是对饮食以及补充和替代疗法的使用的兴趣。尽管有这种兴趣,但令人惊讶的是,对于这些因素对癌症生存的影响却知之甚少。部分原因在于人类群体中饮食与乳腺癌研究的通常方法。以食物和营养为主要兴趣的研究几乎完全集中在癌症病因和预防方面;实际上有数百项此类研究。与此同时,乳腺癌诊断后的人群研究很少考虑生活方式因素。此类研究主要集中在治疗方面,例如不同化疗方案的效果,或者预后因素,例如疾病分期、激素受体状态或基因表达特征对预后的影响。就生活方式因素成为癌症预后研究的重点而言,它们通常旨在探讨这些因素是否影响生活质量,而不是它们是否影响癌症生存或复发。有少数研究将饮食和体育活动等生活方式因素作为主要重点。除了两项随机试验,即女性干预营养研究(WINS)和女性健康饮食与生活研究之外,至少还有5项正在进行的针对乳腺癌幸存者的前瞻性队列研究以饮食为主要重点。尽管这些研究在各个方面存在差异,但它们都旨在研究饮食差异是否可能导致复发率和死亡率的差异。其中一项这样的研究,即途径研究,是一项前瞻性队列研究,于2006年初开始招募研究参与者。这项研究的独特之处在于,它在实际可行的情况下,在乳腺癌诊断后尽快招募女性,而其他研究通常在辅助治疗完成后或更晚才招募女性。这项研究以及其他研究有望提供一些关于饮食与乳腺癌预后的首批客观信息,并成为其他癌症饮食与预后研究的典范。