Butler Colleen A, Griffin Michael J
Human Factors Research Unit, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006 Dec;77(12):1236-43.
Repetitive braking and acceleration can cause carsickness, with the extent of sickness depending on the forward view outside the car.
It was hypothesized that the visual scene would influence motion sickness caused by low-frequency, low-magnitude fore-and-aft oscillation in the laboratory.
There were 120 seated male subjects who were exposed to 30 min of 0.1-Hz fore-and-aft oscillation at an acceleration magnitude of 0.89 m x s(-2) rms (a displacement of +/- 3.18 m). Subjects sat in a cabin with one of six scenes: 1) an internal view of two-dimensional black shapes on a white background; 2) an external view of the same two-dimensional shapes; 3) an external view of six horizontal black lines; 4) a 'real' three-dimensional external view; 5) no view (blindfolded); or 6) an internal collimated view of the two-dimensional shapes. Due to practical constraints, only conditions 1, 2, and 6 were tested in a balanced order. Ratings of motion sickness were obtained at 1-min intervals.
Each of the six conditions caused motion sickness, with mean illness ratings that increased similarly over time regardless of viewing condition. The symptoms did not differ significantly between conditions and there was no difference in the risk of reaching an illness rating of 2, 'mild symptoms,' between the six viewing conditions.
With a larger number of subjects, a small mean effect of vision might be found with motions having similar frequencies or similar magnitudes to the conditions investigated here. Nevertheless, compared with the large effects of vision with some motions, it is concluded that the visual scene has little effect on sickness caused by pure fore-and-aft oscillation at a frequency of 0.1 Hz and an acceleration magnitude of 0.89 m x s(-2) rms.
反复制动和加速会导致晕车,晕车程度取决于车外的前方视野。
据推测,视觉场景会影响实验室中由低频、低幅度前后振荡引起的晕动病。
120名男性受试者就坐,暴露于0.1赫兹的前后振荡中30分钟,加速度均方根值为0.89米×秒(-2)(位移为±3.18米)。受试者坐在一个舱内,观看六种场景之一:1)白色背景上二维黑色形状的内视图;2)相同二维形状的外视图;3)六条水平黑线的外视图;4)“真实”的三维外视图;5)无视图(蒙眼);或6)二维形状的内部准直视图。由于实际限制,仅按平衡顺序测试了条件1、2和6。每隔1分钟获取晕动病评分。
六种条件中的每一种都会导致晕动病,无论观看条件如何,平均疾病评分随时间的增加方式相似。不同条件之间的症状没有显著差异,六种观看条件之间达到“轻度症状”疾病评分为2级的风险也没有差异。
如果受试者数量更多,对于频率或幅度与本文研究条件相似的运动,可能会发现视觉有微小的平均效应。然而,与某些运动中视觉的巨大效应相比,可以得出结论,视觉场景对由0.1赫兹频率和0.89米×秒(-2)均方根值的纯前后振荡引起的晕动病影响很小。