Klein Tilmann A, Endrass Tanja, Kathmann Norbert, Neumann Jane, von Cramon D Yves, Ullsperger Markus
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Science, Stephanstrasse 1a, Germany, 04103 Leipzig.
Neuroimage. 2007 Feb 15;34(4):1774-81. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.014. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
Error processing results in a number of consequences on multiple levels. The posterior frontomedian cortex (pFMC) is involved in performance monitoring and signalling the need for adjustments, which can be observed as post-error speed-accuracy shifts at the behavioural level. Furthermore autonomic reactions to an error have been reported. The role of conscious error awareness for this processing cascade has received little attention of researchers so far. We examined the neural correlates of conscious error perception in a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study. An antisaccade task known to yield sufficient numbers of aware and unaware errors was used. Results from a metaanalysis were used to guide a region of interest (ROI) analysis of the fMRI data. Consistent with previous reports, error-related activity in the rostral cingulate zone (RCZ), the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and the insular cortex bilaterally was found. Whereas the RCZ activity did not differentiate between aware and unaware errors, activity in the left anterior inferior insular cortex was stronger for aware as compared to unaware errors. This could be due to increased awareness of the autonomic reaction to an error, or the increased autonomic reaction itself. Furthermore, post-error adjustments were only observed after aware errors and a correlation between post-error slowing and the hemodynamic activity in the RCZ was revealed. The data suggest that the RCZ activity alone is insufficient to drive error awareness. Its signal appears to be useful for post-error speed-accuracy adjustments only when the error is consciously perceived.
错误处理会在多个层面产生一系列后果。额中回后部皮质(pFMC)参与绩效监测并发出调整需求的信号,这在行为层面可表现为错误后速度-准确性的转变。此外,已有研究报道了对错误的自主反应。到目前为止,有意识的错误觉察在这一处理过程中的作用很少受到研究人员的关注。我们在一项功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究中考察了有意识错误感知的神经关联。使用了一种已知能产生足够数量的有意识和无意识错误的反扫视任务。荟萃分析的结果被用于指导对fMRI数据的感兴趣区域(ROI)分析。与先前的报道一致,在双侧的喙扣带区(RCZ)、前辅助运动区(pre-SMA)和岛叶皮质中发现了与错误相关的活动。虽然RCZ的活动在有意识和无意识错误之间没有差异,但与无意识错误相比,有意识错误时左侧前岛叶皮质的活动更强。这可能是由于对错误的自主反应意识增强,或者是自主反应本身增强。此外, 仅在有意识错误后观察到错误后的调整,并且揭示了错误后反应减慢与RCZ血流动力学活动之间的相关性。数据表明,仅RCZ的活动不足以引发错误觉察。只有当错误被有意识地感知到时,其信号才似乎有助于错误后速度-准确性的调整。