• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿的符号功能:对图片和模型的理解

Symbolic functioning in very young children: understanding of pictures and models.

作者信息

DeLoache J S

机构信息

Human Development and Family Studies, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801.

出版信息

Child Dev. 1991 Aug;62(4):736-52.

PMID:1718666
Abstract

Before one can understand or use any symbol, one must first realize that it is a symbol, that is, that it stands for or represents something other than itself. This article reports 4 studies investigating very young children's understanding of 2 different kinds of symbolic stimuli--scale models and pictures. The data replicate previous findings that 2.5-year-old children have great difficulty appreciating the relation between a scale model and the larger space it represents, but that they very readily appreciate the relation between a picture and its referent. This result is interpreted in terms of the dual orientation hypothesis. Models are difficult for young children because they require a dual representation--a child must think about a model both as an object itself and as a representation of something else. Because pictures are not salient as real objects, they do not require a dual representation. Several kinds of evidence supporting the dual orientation hypothesis are presented. An additional result was the occurrence of a transfer effect: Prior experience with a picture task led to better performance on a subsequent model task. This finding suggests that experience with a symbolic medium they understand can help young children figure out a different, unfamilar medium that they would otherwise not understand.

摘要

在一个人能够理解或使用任何符号之前,首先必须意识到它是一个符号,也就是说,它代表或象征着除自身之外的其他事物。本文报告了4项研究,这些研究调查了幼儿对两种不同符号刺激——比例模型和图片——的理解。数据重复了之前的研究结果,即2.5岁的儿童在理解比例模型与其所代表的更大空间之间的关系时存在很大困难,但他们能很容易地理解图片与其所指对象之间的关系。这一结果根据双重定向假设进行了解释。模型对幼儿来说很难,因为它们需要双重表征——儿童必须既将模型视为一个物体本身,又将其视为其他事物的表征。因为图片作为真实物体并不突出,所以它们不需要双重表征。文中呈现了几种支持双重定向假设的证据。另一个结果是出现了迁移效应:先前在图片任务中的经验导致在随后的模型任务中表现更好。这一发现表明,对他们所理解的符号媒介的经验可以帮助幼儿弄清楚一种不同的、原本他们无法理解的陌生媒介。

相似文献

1
Symbolic functioning in very young children: understanding of pictures and models.幼儿的符号功能:对图片和模型的理解
Child Dev. 1991 Aug;62(4):736-52.
2
Transfer in young children's understanding of spatial representations.幼儿对空间表征理解的转变。
Child Dev. 1994 Feb;65(1):1-15.
3
Young children's use of scale models: testing an alternative to representational insight.幼儿对比例模型的使用:检验一种替代表征洞察力的方法。
Dev Sci. 2007 Nov;10(6):763-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2007.00625.x.
4
Transfer by very young children in the symbolic retrieval task.非常年幼的儿童在符号检索任务中的迁移。
Child Dev. 2004 Nov-Dec;75(6):1708-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00811.x.
5
The medium can obscure the message: young children's understanding of video.媒介可能会模糊信息:幼儿对视频的理解。
Child Dev. 1998 Aug;69(4):950-65.
6
Waiting to use a symbol: the effects of delay on children's use of models.等待使用一个符号:延迟对儿童模型使用的影响。
Child Dev. 1995 Dec;66(6):1875-89.
7
Dual representation and young children's use of scale models.双重表征与幼儿对比例模型的使用。
Child Dev. 2000 Mar-Apr;71(2):329-38. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00148.
8
Less is more: executive function and symbolic representation in preschool children.少即是多:学前儿童的执行功能与符号表征
Psychol Sci. 2005 Aug;16(8):609-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01583.x.
9
The role of intentionality and iconicity in children's developing comprehension and production of cartographic symbols.意向性和象似性在儿童对地图符号理解与生成发展过程中的作用。
Child Dev. 2008 May-Jun;79(3):668-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01150.x.
10
Children's questions: a mechanism for cognitive development.儿童的问题:一种认知发展机制。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2007;72(1):vii-ix, 1-112; discussion 113-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5834.2007.00412.x.

引用本文的文献

1
The influence of labelling on symbolic understanding and dual representation in autism spectrum condition.标签对自闭症谱系障碍中符号理解和双重表征的影响。
Autism Dev Lang Impair. 2020 Jun 9;5:2396941520931728. doi: 10.1177/2396941520931728. eCollection 2020 Jan-Dec.
2
Parent book choices: How do parents select books to share with infants and toddlers with language impairment?家长的书籍选择:家长如何挑选书籍与有语言障碍的婴幼儿分享?
J Early Child Lit. 2022 Jun;22(2):279-307. doi: 10.1177/1468798420985668. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
Do Young Children of the "Selfie Generation" Understand Digital Photos as Representations?
“自拍一代”的幼儿是否将数码照片理解为一种表征?
Hum Behav Emerg Technol. 2021 Oct;3(4):512-524. doi: 10.1002/hbe2.287. Epub 2021 Oct 3.
4
For 19-Month-Olds, What Happens On-Screen Stays On-Screen.对于19个月大的孩子来说,屏幕上出现的内容就停留在屏幕上。
Open Mind (Camb). 2021 Sep 10;5:71-90. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00043. eCollection 2021.
5
Iconic realism or representational blindness? How young children and adults reason about pictures and objects.标志性现实主义还是表征性盲视?幼儿和成年人如何对图片和物体进行推理。
J Cogn Dev. 2020;21(5):774-796. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2020.1802276. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
6
The implicit reward value of the owner's face for dogs.狗对主人面孔的潜在奖励价值。
iScience. 2021 Jun 24;24(8):102763. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102763. eCollection 2021 Aug 20.
7
Touchscreens for Whom? Working Memory and Age Moderate the Impact of Contingency on Toddlers' Transfer From Video.触屏是为谁准备的?工作记忆和年龄调节了偶发性对幼儿从视频中进行迁移的影响。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 24;12:621372. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.621372. eCollection 2021.
8
New indices to characterize drawing behavior in humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).用于描述人类(智人)和黑猩猩(黑猩猩)绘画行为的新指标。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 16;11(1):3860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-83043-0.
9
Developmental differences in children's and adults' use of geometric information in map-reading tasks.儿童和成人在阅读地图任务中使用几何信息的发展差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0243845. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243845. eCollection 2020.
10
The development of categorisation and conceptual thinking in early childhood: methods and limitations.幼儿期分类与概念思维的发展:方法与局限
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020 Jul 22;33(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00154-9.