Alessandroni Nicolás, Rodríguez Cintia
Department of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), C/ Iván Pavlov, 6, 28049, Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2020 Jul 22;33(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s41155-020-00154-9.
We present a systematic and qualitative review of academic literature on early conceptual development (0-24 months of age), with an emphasis on methodological aspects. The final sample of our review included 281 studies reported in 115 articles. The main aims of the article were four: first, to organise studies into sets according to methodological similarities and differences; second, to elaborate on the methodological procedures that characterise each set; third, to circumscribe the empirical indicators that different sets of studies consider as proof of the existence of concepts in early childhood; last, to identify methodological limitations and to propose possible ways to overcome them. We grouped the studies into five sets: preference and habituation experiments, category extension tasks, object sorting tasks, sequential touching tasks and object examination tasks. In the "Results" section, we review the core features of each set of studies. In the "Discussion" and "Conclusions" sections, we describe, for one thing, the most relevant methodological shortcomings. We end by arguing that a situated, semiotic and pragmatic perspective that emphasises the importance of ecological validity could open up new avenues of research to better understand the development of concepts in early childhood.
我们对关于早期概念发展(0至24个月龄)的学术文献进行了系统的定性综述,重点关注方法学方面。我们综述的最终样本包括115篇文章中报道的281项研究。本文的主要目的有四个:第一,根据方法学上的异同将研究分类;第二,详细阐述每组研究的方法学程序;第三,界定不同组研究视为幼儿概念存在证据的实证指标;最后,识别方法学局限性并提出可能的克服方法。我们将研究分为五组:偏好与习惯化实验、类别扩展任务、物体分类任务、顺序触摸任务和物体检查任务。在“结果”部分,我们综述了每组研究的核心特征。在“讨论”和“结论”部分,一方面,我们描述了最相关的方法学缺点。我们最后指出,强调生态效度重要性的情境、符号学和实用主义视角可能会开辟新的研究途径,以更好地理解幼儿概念的发展。