Suppr超能文献

[二十一世纪X线骨盆测量还有用吗?]

[Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?].

作者信息

Rozenberg P

机构信息

Département de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier Poissy-Saint-Germain-en-Laye, université Versailles-Saint-Quentin, 10, rue du Champ-Gaillard, BP 3082, 78303 Poissy cedex, France.

出版信息

Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2007 Jan;35(1):6-12. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2006.09.028. Epub 2006 Dec 21.

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to perform a critical analysis of publications having estimated the utility of X-ray pelvimetry, in order to allow tangible and useful conclusions for the clinical practice. X-ray pelvimetry was proposed in 3 indications: trial of labour among patients with a history of caesarean section, breech presentation, suspicion of cephalopelvic disproportion. The large majority of these publications are retrospective studies, studying a low number of patients and especially without control groups or randomisation. Their contradictory results and their methodological weaknesses do not allow any conclusion. Published randomised trials are exceptional. Among patients with a history of caesarean section, there is only one randomised trial; it demonstrates that ante-partum X-ray pelvimetry is not necessary prior to a trial labour in women with one previous caesarean section. It increases the caesarean section rate and is a poor predictor of the outcome of labour. There is also only one randomised trial which evaluated the interest of X-ray pelvimetry in patients with a breech presentation: the use of pelvimetry in breech presentation at term does not significantly reduce the overall caesarean-section rate, and does not improve the neonatal issues. However, it allows better selection of the delivery route, with a significantly lower emergency Caesarean-section rate. Finally, the only one randomised trial having studied the utility of X-ray pelvimetry for the prediction of cephalopelvic disproportion shows that pelvimetry is a poor predictor of the outcome of labour, has no influence on the neonatal issues and increases the caesarean sections rate. Furthermore, although radiation exposure during a X-ray pelvimetry is very weak, diagnostic X-ray studies during any stage of gestation have been shown to increase the risk of childhood cancer in the irradiated fetus. In the rare cases where pelvimetry is useful (trial of labour with a breech presentation), it is thus careful to perform a MRI pelvimetry.

摘要

本文的目的是对估计X线骨盆测量效用的出版物进行批判性分析,以便得出对临床实践切实有用的结论。X线骨盆测量适用于3种情况:有剖宫产史的患者试产、臀位、怀疑头盆不称。这些出版物绝大多数是回顾性研究,研究的患者数量较少,尤其是没有对照组或随机分组。它们相互矛盾的结果和方法学上的弱点无法得出任何结论。已发表的随机试验很罕见。在有剖宫产史的患者中,只有一项随机试验;该试验表明,对于有一次剖宫产史的女性,试产前进行产前X线骨盆测量没有必要。它会增加剖宫产率,且对分娩结局预测不佳。也只有一项随机试验评估了X线骨盆测量在臀位患者中的作用:足月臀位时使用骨盆测量并不能显著降低总体剖宫产率,也不能改善新生儿问题。然而,它能更好地选择分娩途径,急诊剖宫产率显著降低。最后,唯一一项研究X线骨盆测量用于预测头盆不称效用的随机试验表明,骨盆测量对分娩结局预测不佳,对新生儿问题没有影响,还会增加剖宫产率。此外,尽管X线骨盆测量期间的辐射暴露非常低,但已表明妊娠任何阶段的诊断性X线检查都会增加受照射胎儿患儿童癌症的风险。在极少数骨盆测量有用的情况下(臀位试产),因此谨慎起见应进行磁共振成像骨盆测量。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验