Chang Chingching
Department of Advertising, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.
J Health Commun. 2006 Dec;11(8):769-88. doi: 10.1080/10810730600959697.
I first explored the strength of Taiwanese high school students' beliefs regarding five antismoking messages. Findings of a nationwide survey showed that the students held these beliefs in the following order of decreasing strength: second-hand smoke damages health, smoking has long-term health consequences, smoking has short-term health consequences, cigarette marketers are manipulative, and smokers are perceived negatively. Experiment one further showed that antismoking ads featuring weakly held beliefs are more effective than those featuring strongly held beliefs. Experiment two demonstrated that antismoking campaigns need to be framed carefully; in general, it is more effective to positively frame messages about strongly held antismoking beliefs but negatively frame messages about weakly held antismoking beliefs.
我首先探究了台湾高中生对五条反吸烟信息的信念强度。一项全国性调查的结果显示,学生们对这些信念的认同程度由高到低依次为:二手烟损害健康、吸烟有长期健康后果、吸烟有短期健康后果、香烟营销商具有欺骗性、吸烟者被负面看待。实验一进一步表明,以信念强度较弱的信息为特色的反吸烟广告比以信念强度较强的信息为特色的广告更有效。实验二证明,反吸烟运动需要精心设计框架;一般来说,对信念强度较强的反吸烟信念进行正面表述,而对信念强度较弱的反吸烟信念进行负面表述会更有效。