Suppr超能文献

植物药在食品补充剂中的应用。监管范围、科学风险评估及声称依据。2005年。

Use of botanicals in food supplements. Regulatory scope, scientific risk assessment and claim substantiation. 2005.

作者信息

Coppens P, Delmulle L, Gulati O, Richardson D, Ruthsatz M, Sievers H, Sidani S

机构信息

European Responsible Nutrition Alliance, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Ann Nutr Metab. 2006;50(6):538-54. doi: 10.1159/000098146. Epub 2006 Dec 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: In the European Union, an elaborate legal framework regulates botanical products both under food and medicinal law. The decision as to which legal framework applies to an individual product may differ between the Member States. In the case of botanical food supplements, all food law provisions apply to their manufacturing, composition and marketing, including the new claims legislation.

METHODS

Elements from EU and national law, scientific and other publications are brought together to investigate how to clarify the differentiation between the use of botanicals for medicinal and health-promoting purposes on a scientific basis.

RESULTS

Guidance on the safety assessment and quality evaluation of botanicals is proposed in light of the different approaches described in the scientific literature with particular attention to the concept of long-term use as an integral part of safety evaluation. Guidance on claims substantiation is also included, taking into consideration the proposed legislation, the concept of long-term experience and grading of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

A model for safety and efficacy assessment of botanical food supplements in the EU is proposed, and should be taken into consideration in the development of legislation and scientific research on botanicals.

摘要

背景/目的:在欧盟,一个详尽的法律框架依据食品法和药品法对植物产品进行监管。对于个别产品适用何种法律框架的判定,各成员国之间可能存在差异。就植物性食品补充剂而言,所有食品法律规定均适用于其生产、成分及销售,包括新的声称法规。

方法

整合欧盟及各国法律、科学及其他出版物中的内容,以研究如何在科学基础上厘清用于药用和促进健康目的的植物使用之间的区别。

结果

鉴于科学文献中描述的不同方法,提出了关于植物安全性评估和质量评价的指南,尤其关注长期使用这一概念作为安全性评估不可或缺的一部分。还纳入了关于声称 substantiation 的指南,同时考虑了拟议的法规、长期经验概念及证据分级。

结论

提出了欧盟植物性食品补充剂安全性和有效性评估的模型,在植物相关立法和科学研究的制定过程中应予以考虑。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验