Suppr超能文献

1995 - 2005年美国指南变更对糖尿病患者高血压控制的影响缺失

Lack of effect of guideline changes on hypertension control for patients with diabetes in the U.S., 1995-2005.

作者信息

Wang Y Richard

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2007 Jan;30(1):49-52. doi: 10.2337/dc06-1573.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of new Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC) guidelines on hypertension control for patients with diabetes in the U.S. using patients without diabetes as the control group for the time trend.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The JNC VI and VII guidelines, published in 1997 and 2003, set more aggressive goal blood pressure for patients with diabetes. Data from the National Disease and Therapeutic Index, a nationally representative survey of outpatient visits in the U.S., was used to compare the difference in hypertension control (blood pressure <140/90 mmHg) between diabetic and nondiabetic visits during 1995-2005.

RESULTS

Hypertension control improved for both diabetic and nondiabetic visits in the study period. Compared with nondiabetic visits, there was no change in hypertension control for diabetic visits before 2001 and an approximately 4% increase afterward (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The publication of new JNC guidelines did not result in substantially better hypertension control for patients with diabetes in the U.S.

摘要

目的

以无糖尿病患者作为时间趋势的对照组,研究美国新的《美国国家联合委员会关于高血压预防、检测、评估和治疗的指南》(JNC)对糖尿病患者高血压控制的影响。

研究设计与方法

1997年和2003年发布的JNC VI和VII指南为糖尿病患者设定了更严格的血压控制目标。利用美国全国疾病和治疗指数(一项对美国门诊就诊情况具有全国代表性的调查)的数据,比较1995 - 2005年期间糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者就诊时高血压控制情况(血压<140/90 mmHg)的差异。

结果

在研究期间,糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者就诊时的高血压控制情况均有所改善。与非糖尿病患者就诊相比,2001年之前糖尿病患者就诊时的高血压控制情况没有变化,之后大约增加了4%(P < 0.001)。

结论

美国新JNC指南的发布并未使糖尿病患者的高血压控制情况得到显著改善。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验