Genton Blaise, Mueller Ivo, Betuela Inoni, Casey Gerard, Ginny Meza, Alpers Michael P, Reeder John C
Swiss Tropical Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS Clin Trials. 2006 Dec 22;1(8):e38. doi: 10.1371/journal.pctr.0010038.
Previous studies of a fixed combination including cotrimoxazole, rifampicin, and isoniazid (Cotrifazid) showed efficacy against resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum in animal models and in small-scale human studies. We conducted a multicentric noninferiority trial to assess the safety and efficacy of Cotrifazid against drug-resistant malaria in Papua New Guinea.
The trial design was open-label, block-randomised, comparative, and multicentric.
The trial was conducted in four primary care health facilities, two in urban and two in rural areas of Madang and East Sepik Province, Papua New Guinea.
Patients of all ages with recurrent uncomplicated malaria were included.
Patients were randomly assigned to receive Cotrifazid, mefloquine, or the standard treatment of quinine with sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP).
Incidence of clinical and laboratory adverse events and rate of clinical and/or parasitological failure at day 14 were recorded.
The safety analysis population included 123 patients assigned to Cotrifazid, 123 to mefloquine, and 123 to quinine + SP. The Cotrifazid group experienced lower overall incidence of adverse events than the other groups. Among the efficacy analysis population (72 Cotrifazid, 71 mefloquine, and 75 quinine + SP), clinical failure rate (symptoms and parasite load) on day 14 was equivalent for the three groups (0% for Cotrifazid and mefloquine; 1% for quinine + SP), but parasitological failure rate (P. falciparum asexual blood-stage) was higher for Cotrifazid than for mefloquine or quinine + SP (9% [PCR corrected 8%] versus 0% and 3%, respectively [p = 0.02]).
Despite what appears to be short-term clinical equivalence, the notable parasitological failure at day 14 in both P. falciparum and P. vivax makes Cotrifazid in its current formulation and regimen a poor alternative combination therapy for malaria.
先前对一种包含复方新诺明、利福平及异烟肼(复方利福平异烟肼片)的固定组合药物进行的研究表明,其在动物模型及小规模人体研究中对恶性疟原虫耐药菌株有效。我们开展了一项多中心非劣效性试验,以评估复方利福平异烟肼片在巴布亚新几内亚治疗耐药疟疾的安全性和有效性。
试验设计为开放标签、区组随机、对照及多中心试验。
试验在巴布亚新几内亚马当省和东塞皮克省的四个基层医疗保健机构进行,其中两个在城市,两个在农村。
纳入所有年龄患有复发性非复杂性疟疾的患者。
患者被随机分配接受复方利福平异烟肼片、甲氟喹或奎宁与磺胺多辛 - 乙胺嘧啶(SP)的标准治疗。
记录临床和实验室不良事件的发生率以及第14天的临床和/或寄生虫学失败率。
安全性分析人群包括123名分配接受复方利福平异烟肼片治疗的患者、123名接受甲氟喹治疗的患者以及123名接受奎宁 + SP治疗的患者。复方利福平异烟肼片组不良事件的总体发生率低于其他组。在疗效分析人群(72名接受复方利福平异烟肼片治疗、71名接受甲氟喹治疗以及75名接受奎宁 + SP治疗)中,三组第14天的临床失败率(症状和寄生虫负荷)相当(复方利福平异烟肼片组和甲氟喹组均为0%;奎宁 + SP组为1%),但复方利福平异烟肼片组的寄生虫学失败率(恶性疟原虫无性血液期)高于甲氟喹组或奎宁 + SP组(分别为9%[PCR校正后为8%]、0%和3%[p = 0.02])。
尽管在短期临床疗效上看似相当,但在第14天恶性疟原虫和间日疟原虫均出现显著的寄生虫学治疗失败情况,这使得当前配方和治疗方案的复方利福平异烟肼片成为一种较差的疟疾联合治疗选择。