Imai Hiroo, Kefalov Vladimir, Sakurai Keisuke, Chisaka Osamu, Ueda Yoshiki, Onishi Akishi, Morizumi Takefumi, Fu Yingbin, Ichikawa Kazuhisa, Nakatani Kei, Honda Yoshihito, Chen Jeannie, Yau King-Wai, Shichida Yoshinori
Department of Biophysics, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University and Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan.
J Biol Chem. 2007 Mar 2;282(9):6677-84. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610086200. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
Signal transduction in rod cells begins with photon absorption by rhodopsin and leads to the generation of an electrical response. The response profile is determined by the molecular properties of the phototransduction components. To examine how the molecular properties of rhodopsin correlate with the rod-response profile, we have generated a knock-in mouse with rhodopsin replaced by its E122Q mutant, which exhibits properties different from those of wild-type (WT) rhodopsin. Knock-in mouse rods with E122Q rhodopsin exhibited a photosensitivity about 70% of WT. Correspondingly, their single-photon response had an amplitude about 80% of WT, and a rate of decline from peak about 1.3 times of WT. The overall 30% lower photosensitivity of mutant rods can be explained by a lower pigment photosensitivity (0.9) and the smaller single-photon response (0.8). The slower decline of the response, however, did not correlate with the 10-fold shorter lifetime of the meta-II state of E122Q rhodopsin. This shorter lifetime became evident in the recovery phase of rod cells only when arrestin was absent. Simulation analysis of the photoresponse profile indicated that the slower decline and the smaller amplitude of the single-photon response can both be explained by the shift in the meta-I/meta-II equilibrium of E122Q rhodopsin toward meta-I. The difference in meta-III lifetime between WT and E122Q mutant became obvious in the recovery phase of the dark current after moderate photobleaching of rod cells. Thus, the present study clearly reveals how the molecular properties of rhodopsin affect the amplitude, shape, and kinetics of the rod response.
视杆细胞中的信号转导始于视紫红质对光子的吸收,并导致产生电反应。反应特征由光转导成分的分子特性决定。为了研究视紫红质的分子特性与视杆细胞反应特征之间的关系,我们培育了一种基因敲入小鼠,其中视紫红质被其E122Q突变体取代,该突变体表现出与野生型(WT)视紫红质不同的特性。带有E122Q视紫红质的基因敲入小鼠视杆细胞的光敏性约为野生型的70%。相应地,它们的单光子反应幅度约为野生型的80%,从峰值下降的速率约为野生型的1.3倍。突变体视杆细胞总体上低30%的光敏性可以通过较低的色素光敏性(0.9)和较小的单光子反应(0.8)来解释。然而,反应下降较慢与E122Q视紫红质间Ⅱ态寿命缩短10倍并无关联。只有在没有抑制蛋白时,这种较短的寿命才在视杆细胞的恢复阶段变得明显。光反应特征的模拟分析表明,单光子反应下降较慢和幅度较小都可以通过E122Q视紫红质的间Ⅰ/间Ⅱ平衡向间Ⅰ的转变来解释。在对视杆细胞进行适度光漂白后,野生型和E122Q突变体之间间Ⅲ寿命的差异在暗电流的恢复阶段变得明显。因此,本研究清楚地揭示了视紫红质的分子特性如何影响视杆细胞反应的幅度、形状和动力学。