Friedman R A, Moak J P, Garson A
Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Aug;14(8):1213-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02857.x.
Pacing system failure due to lead related problems may necessitate repositioning or explantation of the problem lead. Pediatric patients with permanent pacemakers have additional considerations that necessitate revision or explantation of pacing leads. Active fixation type leads appear to offer the physician advantages over passive fixation leads that may make them the lead of choice for use in children. We reviewed our experience with active fixation type leads to determine whether the ease with which these leads could be revised or explanted justified recommending their use in our patients. Eleven patients underwent 13 lead revisions. The time from implant to revision was a mean of 12.3 months. Six patients had previously undergone repair of a congenital heart defect. Modes of pacing were: DDD (seven); AAI (three); and VVI (one). Exposed, isodiametric leads accounted for 11/13 leads. Leads were successfully explanted in nine cases and repositioned in four cases. The only lead that could not be revised and resulted in retention was a nonisodiametric, retractable helix lead at the junction of the subclavian vein and clavicle. We conclude isodiametric active fixation leads can be safely repositioned or explanted in children and should be considered the preferred method for endocardial pacing in children.
因导线相关问题导致的起搏系统故障可能需要重新定位或移除有问题的导线。植入永久性起搏器的儿科患者有其他需要考虑的因素,这使得起搏导线的修订或移除成为必要。与被动固定导线相比,主动固定型导线似乎为医生提供了优势,这可能使它们成为儿童使用的首选导线。我们回顾了我们使用主动固定型导线的经验,以确定这些导线易于修订或移除是否足以证明在我们的患者中推荐使用它们是合理的。11名患者接受了13次导线修订。从植入到修订的时间平均为12.3个月。6名患者此前接受过先天性心脏病修复。起搏模式为:DDD(7例);AAI(3例);VVI(1例)。暴露的等径导线占13根导线中的11根。9例导线成功移除,4例导线成功重新定位。唯一一根无法修订并导致保留的导线是锁骨下静脉与锁骨交界处的非等径可回缩螺旋导线。我们得出结论,等径主动固定导线可以在儿童中安全地重新定位或移除,应被视为儿童心内膜起搏的首选方法。