Bach B A, Knape W A, Edinger M G, Tubbs R R
Medical Department, Becton Dickinson Immunocytometry Systems, San Jose, California 95131-1807.
Am J Clin Pathol. 1991 Nov;96(5):615-27. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/96.5.615.
Twenty-five unselected fresh colon or breast tumors were studied to identify specific components of sample preparation, sample staining, and flow cytometer operation affecting the sensitivity of DNA stemline analysis. Solid tumors were disaggregated using both a published method for mechanical/enzymatic whole cell (M/EWC) isolation and a fine-needle aspiration (FNA) technique. Staining FNA samples with CycleTEST propidium iodide reagents demonstrated improved sensitivity in the recognition of near diploid and near tetraploid aneuploid populations: 9 of 20 resolvable aneuploid DNA stemlines identified in FNA suspensions were not detected or clearly resolved in M/EWC preparations. These results suggest that previously reported discordances between flow and static image cytometry in the recognition of near tetraploid DNA stemlines may be related to inherent limitations of M/EWC. The in vitro FNA technique, when compared to M/EWC, may yield increased sensitivity and precision in clinical DNA stemline analysis when using fresh, unfixed, solid tumor specimens.
对25个未经选择的新鲜结肠或乳腺肿瘤进行了研究,以确定样本制备、样本染色和流式细胞仪操作中影响DNA干系分析灵敏度的特定因素。使用已发表的机械/酶促全细胞(M/EWC)分离方法和细针穿刺(FNA)技术对实体瘤进行解离。用CycleTEST碘化丙啶试剂对FNA样本进行染色,在识别近二倍体和近四倍体非整倍体群体方面显示出更高的灵敏度:在FNA悬液中鉴定出的20个可分辨的非整倍体DNA干系中,有9个在M/EWC制备物中未被检测到或未清晰分辨。这些结果表明,先前报道的在识别近四倍体DNA干系时流式细胞术和静态图像细胞术之间的不一致可能与M/EWC的固有局限性有关。与M/EWC相比,当使用新鲜、未固定的实体瘤标本时,体外FNA技术在临床DNA干系分析中可能会提高灵敏度和精度。