Jaspers V L B, Voorspoels S, Covaci A, Lepoint G, Eens M
Department of Biology, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Environ Int. 2007 Apr;33(3):328-37. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2006.11.011. Epub 2007 Jan 2.
In this study, we investigated whether bird feathers can be used as a non-destructive biomonitor for organic pollutants. We analysed the outermost tail feathers of 8 terrestrial and aquatic bird species from Belgium (8 species, n=108) for polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs). Every compound class could be quantified in one single tail feather of the birds under study (sum PCBs ranging from 5.5 to 510 ng/g feather, sum PBDEs from 0.33 to 53 ng/g feather, sum DDTs from 1.5 to 730 ng/g feather), except for PBDEs in feathers of the common moorhen (Gallinula chloropus). Further, we calculated Pearson correlations between concentrations of organic pollutants in feathers and concentrations in corresponding muscle or liver tissue from the birds. Correlations were found significant in half of the cases of the terrestrial species, but were found not significant for the aquatic species, with the exception of a significant correlation of sum PCBs in the common moorhen. Only for the common buzzard (Buteo buteo) (n=43) all correlations were found significant (0.32<r<0.77). In order to cope for low statistical power, we performed a meta-analysis on all bird species together. This led to significant correlations between levels in feathers and corresponding levels in muscle or liver for all terrestrial birds (p<0.05 in all cases, effect size 0.59 (p,p'-DDE) to 0.71 (Sigma PCB) for levels in feather and muscle). When correlations were recalculated excluding the birds that had died due to starvation, correlation coefficients for the terrestrial birds were found even higher (effect size up to 0.83 (Sigma PCB)). These results have important implications for non-destructive and retrospective biomonitoring. Although our results suggest that exact concentrations in the body cannot be predicted using feathers, bird feathers can give a good estimate of contamination levels in a population and as such are a potential non-destructive biomonitoring tool for organic pollutants. Outermost tail feathers and muscle tissue were also examined for nitrogen (delta15N) and carbon (delta13C) stable isotope content in the different bird species. However, delta15N/delta13C signatures in feather or muscle were not significantly correlated with the corresponding levels of organic pollutants in these tissues. Various confounding factors (such as habitat, condition, age, sex) may have masked a relationship between delta15N values and organic pollutant levels in the birds under study.
在本研究中,我们调查了鸟类羽毛是否可作为有机污染物的非破坏性生物监测器。我们分析了来自比利时的8种陆生和水生鸟类(8个物种,n = 108)最外层尾羽中的多氯联苯(PCBs)、多溴二苯醚(PBDEs)和有机氯农药(OCPs)。在所研究鸟类的单根尾羽中,每类化合物均可被定量(总PCBs含量范围为5.5至510 ng/g羽毛,总PBDEs含量范围为0.33至53 ng/g羽毛,总滴滴涕含量范围为1.5至730 ng/g羽毛),但普通黑水鸡(Gallinula chloropus)羽毛中的PBDEs除外。此外,我们计算了羽毛中有机污染物浓度与鸟类相应肌肉或肝脏组织中浓度之间的Pearson相关性。在陆生鸟类的半数案例中发现相关性显著,但在水鸟中未发现显著相关性,普通黑水鸡中总PCBs的相关性除外。仅对于普通鵟(Buteo buteo)(n = 43),所有相关性均显著(0.32 < r < 0.77)。为了应对统计功效较低的问题,我们对所有鸟类进行了荟萃分析。这导致所有陆生鸟类羽毛中的污染物水平与肌肉或肝脏中的相应水平之间存在显著相关性(所有案例中p < 0.05,羽毛和肌肉中污染物水平的效应大小为0.