Espín S, García-Fernández A J, Herzke D, Shore R F, van Hattum B, Martínez-López E, Coeurdassier M, Eulaers I, Fritsch C, Gómez-Ramírez P, Jaspers V L B, Krone O, Duke G, Helander B, Mateo R, Movalli P, Sonne C, van den Brink N W
Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Murcia, Campus de Espinardo, 30100, Murcia, Spain.
Section of Ecology, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014, Turku, Finland.
Ecotoxicology. 2016 May;25(4):777-801. doi: 10.1007/s10646-016-1636-8. Epub 2016 Mar 5.
Biomonitoring using birds of prey as sentinel species has been mooted as a way to evaluate the success of European Union directives that are designed to protect people and the environment across Europe from industrial contaminants and pesticides. No such pan-European evaluation currently exists. Coordination of such large scale monitoring would require harmonisation across multiple countries of the types of samples collected and analysed-matrices vary in the ease with which they can be collected and the information they provide. We report the first ever pan-European assessment of which raptor samples are collected across Europe and review their suitability for biomonitoring. Currently, some 182 monitoring programmes across 33 European countries collect a variety of raptor samples, and we discuss the relative merits of each for monitoring current priority and emerging compounds. Of the matrices collected, blood and liver are used most extensively for quantifying trends in recent and longer-term contaminant exposure, respectively. These matrices are potentially the most effective for pan-European biomonitoring but are not so widely and frequently collected as others. We found that failed eggs and feathers are the most widely collected samples. Because of this ubiquity, they may provide the best opportunities for widescale biomonitoring, although neither is suitable for all compounds. We advocate piloting pan-European monitoring of selected priority compounds using these matrices and developing read-across approaches to accommodate any effects that trophic pathway and species differences in accumulation may have on our ability to track environmental trends in contaminants.
利用猛禽作为指示物种进行生物监测,已被提议作为一种评估欧盟指令成效的方式,这些指令旨在保护全欧洲的人和环境免受工业污染物和杀虫剂的影响。目前尚无此类泛欧洲评估。协调如此大规模的监测需要在多个国家对采集和分析的样本类型进行统一——不同基质在采集的难易程度和提供的信息方面存在差异。我们报告了有史以来第一次对欧洲各地采集的猛禽样本进行的泛欧洲评估,并评估了它们用于生物监测的适用性。目前,欧洲33个国家约有182个监测项目采集了各种猛禽样本,我们讨论了每种样本在监测当前优先化合物和新出现化合物方面的相对优点。在采集的基质中,血液和肝脏分别最广泛地用于量化近期和长期污染物暴露的趋势。这些基质可能是泛欧洲生物监测最有效的方法,但采集的范围和频率不如其他基质广泛。我们发现,未孵化成功的蛋和羽毛是采集最广泛的样本。由于它们分布广泛,可能为大规模生物监测提供最佳机会,尽管这两种样本都不适用于所有化合物。我们主张试点使用这些基质对选定的优先化合物进行泛欧洲监测,并开发类推方法,以适应营养途径和物种积累差异可能对我们追踪污染物环境趋势能力产生的任何影响。